Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry | | | Last edited: by widescreenforever |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,197 |
| Posted: | | | | "The Lord of the Rings – In J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings trilogy, the female characters play a role that is almost completely negligible. While writing in stronger women increased the appeal of the epic saga for female moviegoers, devotees of the source material were less than pleased about the changes."
Huh. I can only think of Arwen fitting this dessciption. If anything, both Galadriel and Eowyn were much stronger female characters in the book. | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
Registered: June 12, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,665 |
| Posted: | | | | And why bother even including I, Robot on the list. The only thing the film and book (a group of short stories) shared was a title and some character names. | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | I found that article to be a little lacking. An in deapth article, detailing how the plots were changed, would have been much better. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,745 |
| Posted: | | | | I find the thread title to be a bit misleading. The article is about movies that changed the plot of books. But here it states "movies tha changed the world of novels". What the article describes is just adaption decay. | | | Karsten DVD Collectors Online
|
|
Registered: May 25, 2007 | Posts: 15 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting KinoNiki: Quote: Huh. I can only think of Arwen fitting this dessciption. If anything, both Galadriel and Eowyn were much stronger female characters in the book. I found the movie metamorphose of Arwen into a character, rather than a victory trophy, quite acceptable. Tolkien wasn't all that good at women. Jackson et al really had to something for the movie, because Aragorn would have been out of his mind to choose Arwen over Eowyn as portrayed in the books. My literature-to-screen loss of innocence was Mary Poppins. I eventually came to see the Disney movie as a gem in its own right, but Julie Andrews never even met the Mary Poppins of my childhood bedtime reading. While on the subject of movies that took a title and some characters from a novel, and then wandered off into their own universe, I have to vote for (against?) Chocolat. A Joanne Harris novel of the battle between good and evil, turned into a sickly movie choc-top. I'm not forgiving that one in a hurry. Liz |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting widescreenforever: Quote: Great Article... Meh. They skipped hundreds of examples,went into virtually no detail, and then concluded with the assumption that any deviations from the novels must be for the worse. I didn't get much out of it. --------------- |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,197 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting AussieLiz: Quote:
I found the movie metamorphose of Arwen into a character, rather than a victory trophy, quite acceptable. Tolkien wasn't all that good at women. Jackson et al really had to something for the movie, because Aragorn would have been out of his mind to choose Arwen over Eowyn as portrayed in the books.
To be fair to Tolkien, the filmmakers wisely included parts from the appendices where the relation between Aragorn and Arwen is explored in more detail. But you are right, the change didn't do the films any harm and I haven't really heard too many complaints from fans either. There were other much worse changes done that some of them rightfully complained about. | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 | | | Last edited: by Nexus the Sixth |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Quoting widescreenforever:
Quote: Great Article... Meh. They skipped hundreds of examples,went into virtually no detail, and then concluded with the assumption that any deviations from the novels must be for the worse. I didn't get much out of it.
--------------- Same here .. but wanted to Gage the forum on a percentage of what drives the topics .. so with quite a few other inane topics sometimes.. I thought I'd stoop to see how far we can go into a conversation between / amongst us .... | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | Ha ! Figured ........ | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry |
|