I’m living in Spain. Many disc editions in this country includes not only the main Spanish language but also the Catalonian one (a few times, also are included the Euskera and Galician ones). All these languages are part of the common spoken in this territory.  To my surprise, I found that many spanish contributions avoid rigor when replace “English, Spanish and Catalonian” languages by “English, Spanish and other” languages. I try to help Invelos community to amend this lack of precision with updated contributions (by other way, it seems that supervisor is very slow to approve these updates that are so obvious in the covers). It’s so surprising like to contribute with Canadian “English, French” two language disc edition by replacing to “English, other” languages or “French, other” languages. May I suggest a contribution rule that avoid this abuse of “other language” description and let a common sense.  I may understand, but not approve, that “other” replaces a long list of unusual languages in a territory but I can’t see approved in any way a local language considered as “other” when this "other" just replace one language.

Catalonian and Galician are both choices in the audio drop down.  As far as Euskera goes, the internet tells me that's an endonym for the Basque language, so that would fit under the drop down of Basque.

So in none of these cases should Other be used (or Spanish).

At least, this would be correct if I'm understanding what you're posting about correctly.