I've had a look and I don't think you have done anything wrong. I think a screener (or maybe some automatic filter) has had a 'knee-jerk' reaction to the word 'imdb' in your contribution. It's there as a source for your BY contribution.

I've had some things declined in the past because I've mentioned IMDB in the notes. (Even when I specifically say that I'm replacing information that seems to be taken from IMDB).

I think it's probably that.

Try resubmitting and I'll bet it goes through the second time.

Another thought. Try sesubmitting without the BY change so that all the other corrections go through. Then, when that first contribution is approved, resubmit just the BY change with your source information. New BY contributions automatically go through to some sort of second-level review process and that might be making it complicated to get the rest f your contribution approved.

wondering if the screeners are more interested in the actor Richard Wright, rather than the 'musician' who isn't in any Movies ......

Quoting widescreenforever:

Quote:
wondering if the screeners are more interested in the actor Richard Wright, rather than the 'musician' who isn't in any Movies ......

This could be more likely the case if the musician isn't on any DVD releases. Because if this is someone that isn't in the credits of any of DVD release... the birth year wouldn't be needed until that changes.

Another thing to check... this decline reason is used a lot of times when there is undocumented Uncredited Cast. Check to see if there is any uncredited cast. If there is you need to let them know how you know they are there.

Quoting Addicted2DVD:

Quote:
Another thing to check... this decline reason is used a lot of times when there is undocumented Uncredited Cast. Check to see if there is any uncredited cast. If there is you need to let them know how you know they are there.

No uncredited cast anywhere in this contribution...

It is sounding more and more like a mistake to me then. After all the screeners are only human too. And Gerri herself has said in the past that the approve and decline button are right next to each other. So it is easy to hit the wrong one by accident.

I would try to resubmit.

If you want to be sure... you could always open a support ticket. I did that not too long ago when I was adding cover images to a profile that had none at all. And they replied it was their error... but they had caught it so it would be going through despite the fact that it said declined on my side.

It turns out this was indeed a mistake, the contribution has been approved  .

Quoting bigdaddyhorse:

Quote:
I had some cover scans declined for the same generic reason a little bit ago, just had to laugh. Third party? I guess so... there's me, the cover and the scan of the cover.

I'll happily assume in your case this was indeed an error but they may use that generic reason if they think the cover has come from a site that has put watermarks on