| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 17,804 |
| |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 762 |
| | Posted: | | | | I was thinking the same thing. Maybe those should be all collected in one thread. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quote:
Is it really necessary to hijack the "Today's Active Topics" with endless common name threads? No. | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
| Registered: July 31, 2008 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 2,506 |
| | Posted: | | | | Shouldn't this be a poll? I'm sure some people might think it's necessary!  | | | | Last edited: by Ardos |
|
 | Blair | | Resistance is Futile! |
| Registered: October 30, 2008 | | Posts: 1,249 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheDarkKnight: Quote:
I was thinking the same thing. Maybe those should be all collected in one thread. Or at least into a new forumn *hint hint Ken* even though that doesn't help this situation. I don't see the problem (I see the issue, but not the problem). Updates or questions were made, those topics are meant to serve a high priority for the database, they deserve just as much of a right to be there in bulk as any other topics even though it looks... um.... "overbearing" I guess is the word I'm looking for. All of the other active topics are in the list; you just have to scroll a bit for a change. | | | If at first you don't succeed, skydiving isn't for you.
He who MUST get the last word in on a pointless, endless argument doesn't win. It makes him the bigger jerk. | | | | Last edited: by Blair |
|
 | T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 8,733 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting kahless: Quote:
Is it really necessary to hijack the "Today's Active Topics" with endless common name threads?  Here's a quick tip: if you implement a forum block for user "surfeur51" (under "My Profiler" / "Blocked Users", bottom of the page), you'll find that the number of "Todays Active Topics" already cleans up nicely. And you'll still get to keep the common name-finding threads that are actually being maintained by someone, or at least the ones where something actually happens. | | | | Last edited: by T!M |
|
| Corne | | Registered: Nov. 1, 2000 |
| Registered: April 5, 2007 | | Posts: 1,059 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote:
Quoting kahless:
Quote:
Is it really necessary to hijack the "Today's Active Topics" with endless common name threads?
Here's quick tip: if you implement a forum block for user "surfeur51" (under "My Profiler" / "Blocked Users", bottom of the page), you'll find that the "Todays Active Topics" clean up nicely. And you'll still get to keep the common name-finding threads that are actually being maintained by someone. Thanks for the tip!  | | | | Cor |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheDarkKnight: Quote:
I was thinking the same thing. Maybe those should be all collected in one thread. Lol, glad to see I'm not the only one with this idea. Quoting Blair: Quote:
... Or at least into a new forumn *hint hint Ken* even though that doesn't help this situation.
... This even made me more loughing: The user who was one of the biggest opponents against a new forum has shown very impressive it would be useful.  |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Hopeing on one or two of those started threads something good exists because of the help of some users. (It would be a pity to lose the confirmations some users already did in those threads) Another good thing I learned because of this: If you remove a positive vote from a vote, you get it back and you have the possibility to put it on another post. |
|
| Registered: May 20, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,934 |
| | Posted: | | | | I don't know how this forum works, but
Is there a possibility that someone( or 2) could offer to be a a moderator/keeper of a new thread. Someone with plenty of time to keep the info neat and tidy and on topic?
Just a thought.
Charlie |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,804 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote:
Quoting kahless:
Quote:
Is it really necessary to hijack the "Today's Active Topics" with endless common name threads?
Here's a quick tip: if you implement a forum block for user "surfeur51" (under "My Profiler" / "Blocked Users", bottom of the page), you'll find that the number of "Todays Active Topics" already cleans up nicely. And you'll still get to keep the common name-finding threads that are actually being maintained by someone, or at least the ones where something actually happens. Thanks for the hint! I'm aware of the forum block function. I use this feature only as "ultima ratio"! | | | | Thorsten |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 762 |
| | Posted: | | | | Holy cow, I only just now realized how many of those threads were opened. Please, they will just get lost and forgotten. What a waste of time and space.  |
|