My list of pending updates shows a contribution for 'Hot Shots! Part Deux', and it has, among other things, this cast change:



Now, I can understand the move of these three people to the top, as it is actually true that these three are shown in the end credits BEFORE the "regular" cast list (note that the current profile has them listed at the very bottom of the cast list, after those credited in the "regular" cast list). So yeah, I understand the move to the top - I'm not questioning that. I do want to know about the empty divider, though. Yes or no: are we really using empty dividers for this?

I would vote no if I seen this situation come up for vote.

No to both the group divider and the group end divider.

Quote:
Yes or no: are we really using empty dividers for this?

No.

Semms like much ado about nothing (However, something we are famous for), I wouldn't say yes or no either way.

Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:

Quote:
Semms like much ado about nothing

It's not. I wanted to know whether to vote "yes" or "no", and now I know what to do. Many thanks to those whon gave their opinion!

I'll also explain to you WHY this is not "much ado about nothing": if nobody votes against this (and I actually was the first no-voter after many yes-voters) it's likely to get accepted into the database. Since I wouldn't be doing this locally, that would virtually cut me off from contributing any further cast additions or corrections to that profile - if I wanted to do that, I'd have to go through the ordeal of putting the empty divider in my cast list first, then contribute the necessary changes, and then fix it right back. I can see how this wouldn't pose a problem for a user that doesn't contribute, but for others, it does, and that's why it's decidedly not "much ado about nothing".

Martian:

I don't believe that you can legitimately vote No. Based on the wording of the Rules you could make an argument for both yes and no. The issue is not explicitly discussed in the Rules therefore any such no vote would be creating your own Rule and not following the rules as written. I repeat i could make an argument for either yes or No based upon the Rules, BUT it is not explicitly covered. Sorry.

Actually, the contribution is mine. I've tried to use an end divider only, but this didn't work. The way I contributed it, is the only way I could match the credits. If nobody wants this, I'll keep it local. If anybody has a better way, I'm open to suggestions. But the way the profile is now, is completely wrong, as the original contritbutor added the first 3 credited actors at the end of the cast list.