| Author |
Message |
| Registered: May 18, 2007 |  Posts: 389 |
| | Posted: | | | | I came across "Dubbing Recordist" last nite and I'd like to know under the new rules where would this go in the sound crew. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 6,635 |
| |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | I have to agree with Hal... if it isn't listed in the chart then I wouldn't include it. | | | | Pete |
|
  | T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 8,732 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote:
Nowhere. Indeed. It's the UK equivalent of "recordist" or "sound recordist" in modern films - something we're not after either. |
|
| Registered: May 18, 2007 | | Posts: 389 |
| |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 1,819 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote:
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
Nowhere.
Indeed. It's the UK equivalent of "recordist" or "sound recordist" in modern films - something we're not after either. Here I have to disagree with you. The rules state: Primarily used in older filmsThe rules don't state NOT to add Recordist for modern films. Personally I always add them and have never received a no vote. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | I have to agree with Pantheon on that... just because it tells you it is primarily used in older films in no way says not to use the credit any other time. As long as it matches the credit in the crew table (and don't go against any notes or such) it should be used. And no... I don't think "Primnarily used in Older Films" is telling us not to use it in modern films. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | We track Sound Re-recordists, ...
... Dubbing Recordist = Sound Recordist ...
I'm not familar with these. What difference makes the "re-"?
(And this is really a honest question) | | | | Last edited: by VirusPil |
|
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,732 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote:
I don't think "Primnarily used in Older Films" is telling us not to use it in modern films. So what does that note tell you? Basically nothing at all, I gather? On one hand you see that note, and other hand you audit a thousand definitely "modern" films that have such a credit - yet the note still leaves you absolutely cold? Basically you stop reading after "Primarily" - anything after that doesn't matter? | | | | Last edited: by T!M |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Show me where it says not to contribute them if they are in a modern movie? It says it is primarily in older movies. It says a statement of where I can expect to see it most the time. No more and no less. And what bit of crew I have done so far that seems like an accurate statement. But it does not say not to include them if they are in a modern movie. No where that I see at least. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote:
I have to agree with Pantheon on that... just because it tells you it is primarily used in older films in no way says not to use the credit any other time. As long as it matches the credit in the crew table (and don't go against any notes or such) it should be used. And no... I don't think "Primnarily used in Older Films" is telling us not to use it in modern films. There's no role in the crew table for "Dubbing Recordist". If it were "Sound Recordist" or "Dubbing Mixer" you'd have an argument. | | | | Hal | | | | Last edited: by hal9g |
|
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,732 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote:
There's no role in the crew table for "Dubbing Recordist".
If it were just "Recordist", you'd have an argument. There's no role in the crew table for "Recordist" either - and rightly so. There is for "Sound Recordist", but that's something else entirely - one really shouldn't be mistaken for the other. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote:
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
There's no role in the crew table for "Dubbing Recordist".
If it were just "Recordist", you'd have an argument.
There's no role in the crew table for "Recordist" either - and rightly so. There is for "Sound Recordist", but that's something else entirely - one really shouldn't be mistaken for the other. Edited my post before seeing yours. | | | | Hal |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote:
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
I have to agree with Pantheon on that... just because it tells you it is primarily used in older films in no way says not to use the credit any other time. As long as it matches the credit in the crew table (and don't go against any notes or such) it should be used. And no... I don't think "Primnarily used in Older Films" is telling us not to use it in modern films.
There's no role in the crew table for "Dubbing Recordist".
If it were "Sound Recordist" or "Dubbing Mixer" you'd have an argument. Hal... I am talking in general here.... I am talking about the roles that are allowed. I am saying if there is a role in the credits that match the roles we do track... that the note saying "Primarily in older Films" does not stop us from tracking those allowed roles for modern movies. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote:
Hal... I am talking in general here.... I am talking about the roles that are allowed.
I am saying if there is a role in the credits that match the roles we do track... that the note saying "Primarily in older Films" does not stop us from tracking those allowed roles for modern movies. Yes, that I agree with. | | | | Hal |
|
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,732 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote:
the note saying "Primarily in older Films" does not stop us from tracking those allowed roles for modern movies. Indeed - it leaves room for occasional exceptions. But it doesn't mean you should automatically enter all of them if it's not an older film. It may indeed be one of the few exceptions that the note is meant to allow, but most of them (in modern films, that is) shouldn't be entered. |
|