| Author |
Message |
| Registered: May 26, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 2,878 |
| | Posted: | | | | Do you think that the new group dividers should be used for Captains in the English Army & Soldiers in the English Army in the credits below? I ask because they are clearly grouped, but not with dividers as we usually see them. The current role credits are done this way: Role (Group)  | | | If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.
-- Thorin Oakenshield |
|
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,741 |
| | Posted: | | | | I would use the dividers for this one. | | | | Marty - Registered July 10, 2004, User since 2002. |
|
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 1,945 |
| | Posted: | | | | I would use em too  | | | | www.tvmaze.com |
|
| Registered: May 29, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,475 |
| |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Yup... They should be used in that example | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 79 |
| | Posted: | | | | I would not use group dividers for these. Cast with group dividers in the DVDP credits window are given a prominence that is not warranted by their appearance in the film credit roll.
I feel that listing the cast without a divider, repeating the role, is a much closer representation of the actual film credits. I would only use group dividers when the credits include a group heading.
Just my 2c. I wouldn't vote no to either option. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | I'd use them in this case. | | | | Hal |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dag Ove: Quote:
I would not use group dividers for these. Cast with group dividers in the DVDP credits window are given a prominence that is not warranted by their appearance in the film credit roll.
I feel that listing the cast without a divider, repeating the role, is a much closer representation of the actual film credits. I would only use group dividers when the credits include a group heading.
Just my 2c. I wouldn't vote no to either option. Just an FYI... When this was asked about (when the group dividers first came to be) in the Rules Committee Forum.. Ken said he meant it to be for both types of group dividers. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: May 20, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,934 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting mreeder50: Quote:
I would use the dividers for this one. Count me positive Charlie |
|
| Registered: March 24, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,044 |
| | Posted: | | | | Looks like I'm on the positive bandwagon too.  Rory  | | | DVD Profiler for iOS as of 3/5/2013
DVD Profiler for Android as of 5/17/2013 |
|
| Registered: March 28, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 1,299 |
| | Posted: | | | | Yup, I too would use dividers. | | | Tags, tags, bo bags, banana fana fo fags, mi my mo mags, TAGS!
Dolly's not alone. You can also clone profiles.
You've got questions? You've got answers? Take the DVD Profiler Wiki for a spin. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,201 |
| | Posted: | | | | Agreed, I use them for any group role. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 844 |
| | Posted: | | | | use use use use |
|
| Registered: May 18, 2007 |  Posts: 232 |
| | Posted: | | | | This must be the clearest example of when to use it, I'd say. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 906 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dag Ove: Quote:
I feel that listing the cast without a divider, repeating the role, is a much closer representation of the actual film credits. I would only use group dividers when the credits include a group heading.
For what it's worth, I agree with you that we shouldn't use the group header when it's only repeating roles, but neither the rules nor Ken agrees with me and I haven't been able to come up with an argument against it (the rules aren't set in stone, so please head over to the contribution rules forum of you want to change it) Second, there is a group header here. It's not just repeating the roles, so in this case, I'm all for including it. | | | 
The colour of her eyes, were the colour of insanity | | | | Last edited: by reybr |
|
| Registered: May 26, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,878 |
| | Posted: | | | | Okay! I'll go ahead and make the changes then. Thanks everybody! | | | If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.
-- Thorin Oakenshield |
|