| Author |
Message |
  | T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 8,726 |
| | Posted: | | | | Does a "Prosthetic Makeup for <actor name>" credit qualify for a credit as "make-up artist", "make-up effects", or nothing at all? |
|
| Registered: October 13, 2008 |  Posts: 260 |
| | Posted: | | | | I would have thought Prosthetic Makeup would be make-up effects. Makeup for <actor name> is valid so I assume Prosthetic Makeup for <actor name> is valid as well | | | | Last edited: by Rogue.9 |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 2,366 |
| | Posted: | | | | I say, since this prosthetic make-up artist worked on a certain individual we shouldn't enter him/her at all. We only should enter the prosthetic makeup designers, creators or supervisors. | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands |
|
| Registered: October 13, 2008 | | Posts: 260 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Daddy DVD: Quote:
I say, since this prosthetic make-up artist worked on a certain individual we shouldn't enter him/her at all. We only should enter the prosthetic makeup designers, creators or supervisors. We enter Make-Up when it's for an individual so I couldn't see why prosthetic make-up would be any different | | | | Last edited: by Rogue.9 |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 6,730 |
| | Posted: | | | | Even though "prosthetic make-up" is commonly entered as "Make-Up-Effects" it's in fact not covered by the contribution rules. "Make-Up-Effects" are defined as the following individual credits Quote:
Make-up Effects, Special Make-up Effects [by] But if it would be entered I'd agree with Rogue.9 | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | As it is now, NO. But with a mod to the Rules Make-Up Effects
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 1,022 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr Pavlov: Quote:
As it is now, NO. But with a mod to the Rules Make-Up Effects
Skip This sounds logical | | |  |
|
| Registered: June 21, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,621 |
| | Posted: | | | | I'm voting for make-up effects. I brought this up in the rules committee, but the thread kinda died off. Seemed like almost everyone was in favor of prothetics being a M-U effects credit. I've got a ton of them in my local crew credits, waiting for the day the rule is modified and they can be included. I probably should've taken notes on which titles have them though, gonna be difficult to find them blindly. Maybe I can search for the custom field.  |
|
| Registered: April 3, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,998 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting richierich: Quote:
Quoting Dr Pavlov:
Quote:
As it is now, NO. But with a mod to the Rules Make-Up Effects
Skip
This sounds logical +1 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,201 |
| | Posted: | | | | I am with Rogue. In my opinion, Prosthetic Makeup is a makeup effect. We credit makeup for individuals, so makeup effects for an individual should be o.k..
I will admit, however, that I am pushing the envelope with these new undefined credits. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|