Quote:
I have received about 20 Pending Updates to vote on.  Is there a standard in terms of the way the description is formatted?  For instance, from the backs of the DVDs :

Phantom Menace : PG
Attack of the Clones : Rated PG for sustained sequences of sci-fi action/violence.
Revenge of the Sith : PG
Violence
Not Recommended for Young Children
Disturbing Content

Star Wars : PG For Sci-Fi Violence and Brief Mild Language.
Empire : PG For Sci-Fi Violence
Return : PG For Sci-Fi Violence

A few things to note;
1). Only 2 of the 6 end the description with a period.
2). Some are all small letters, most capitalize all words except conjunctions
3). Only Revenge has the rating on 3 lines with no joiners.
4). The latter 3 all have the word "For" in the ratings, Attack has "for".
5). Phantom is not on the case (hence would need to come from one of the sites listed in the contribution notes).

Just thought I might point out some of the differences.  Is there a standard?  Should we put in exactly what is on the DVD, but then what about if we take it from a site?  Capitalize it the same way or all small letters?  Add a period?

I realize I am being super-anal, but would like a standard established at the outset if possible.

Thanks,
DD.

Quote:
I've added a capitalization section to the ratings description rules.  Additionally, I've added a filter to the rating description field to strip trailing periods.

Quote:
Enter rating details as shown, excluding the rating itself and trailing period. e.g. "Rated R for sci-fi violence and brief language." is entered as "Sci-fi violence and brief language".

For English profiles, capitalize all words except joining words such as "of", "the", "a", "in", etc. For non-English profiles, use capitalization rules common to the language of the profile, as commonly used for titles. In all cases, the first word will be automatically capitalized in your submission.