Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1... 3 4 5  Previous Next
|
 Capitalization question (Locked) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 2,337 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Winston Smith: Quote:
Excuse me for saying this but its my reaction.
Might just have added and what might be useful to the community and/or other users be fanned, ken doesn't require it I'm not going to do it. Not a single keystroke, and some wonder why I stopped  cpntributing Invelos doesn't require documentation of this matter. That's all we need to know. That also means you cannot vote no based on lack of documentation, if the contribution is otherwise correct. This whining is getting really, really, really OLD. Try to get over it. If you have complains, complain to Ken. Do not vote no to per rules contributions or attack contributors. You are the most laziest, since you don't contribute at all. All you do is bitch about other people contribution notes. |
| | Registered: August 23, 2008 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 1,656 |
| | Posted: | | | | | | | Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com
"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo. |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Talk about whining want to talk about pros like yourself. Wow, the list pro whiners would be longer than I want to think about.
As to your reference on attack, I have attacked no one. I asked a simple question and was told to buzz off in polite terms. The user indicated on their own that they would do no more than required even if it might be useful to the community it other users. I won't call it lazy, it is just plain selfish and inconsider
As to your final attack. I decided to stop contributing because of users such as the one described an d because of abusive users like yourself and other
er | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
| | Registered: May 29, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 3,475 |
| | Posted: | | | | Since my motives, honesty and integrity have been called into question, I think it important to post the following.
Although I seldom call out a community member in my contribution notes, I have made an exception in a few cases. In each case it has been this particular community member who's comments I feel have been inappropriate.
The title that was the imputes for this thread is Billy Elliot: US profile: UPC 025192113420. My documentation notes are as follows:
"I'm sorry to make you vote again but Skip, the original contributor and lone "no" vote continues to add comments which I then edited to explain my rationale and links backing that rationale.
In order to make it easier for voters and screeners, I am resubmitting this profile to consolidate all the additions/changes and rationale in order to make it easier for the voters and screeners.
I will not edit this profile again or address "no" votes. I believe that this new contribution follows the rules and guidelines of Ken and invelos.
I have been very careful to insure this contributions accuracy since the first time I submitted it. But, like anyone I can make a mistake, if so I still believe this profile should be accepted according to Ken:
http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=345020&PageNum=2&messageID=889325#M889325.
Please note that I am not addressing Colin Maclachlan vs. Colin MacLachlan in this section. I will address that under the Cast section documentation.
Rating: Back cover.
MC: Back cover.
Studios: Universal Focus, not Universal Pictures, and Studio Canal start at the very beginning of the DVD. They are separate from Working Title, BBC and Tiger Aspects.
Additional sources to document these changes are correct:
- http://ftvdb.bfi.org.uk/sift/title/633562
- http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/review/309
- http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0249462/companycredits
- http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/201730/Billy-Elliot/credits
Crew:
3.5 data updated: Costume Designer, Make-Up Artists and Visual Effects: DVD end credits.
Cast:
Propagating Jamie Bell (1986) accepted BY: http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=250804&PageNum=7&messageID=661256#M661256.
The online and my local database differ: Colin Maclachlan vs. Colin MacLachlan. I submitted my initial contribution based on my understanding of the issue. But, after receiving a "no" vote I posted a query in the forums because I could not find the link.
When I see a "no" vote, I prefer to provide a direct link supporting my rationale so I posted this thread:
http://www.invelos.com/MessagePost.aspx?task=replyquote&TopicID=587682&MessageID=1701599.
Thanks to Pete and VirusPil for providing the link I was looking for in which Ken supports the way I have contributed this section of this profile:
http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=425379&PageNum=4&messageID=1340514#M1340514.
I think it is obvious that I put a lot of time and research into this single Cast member. It is not, as Skip claims, for lack of respect of the invelos community. Or, for any other reason he cited in both the forums and the voting page.
The reason is quite simple, I am not going to spend time on something that does not impact or contribute to the online database.
Uncredited Cast removed. There is no documentation for the Uncredited Cast. They are also a close match to IMDb including the use of the single quotation marks.
In the end credits there is a short note in the end credits which reads: Swan Lake appears... but there are no single quotation marks.
The removal of these Uncredited Cast is in compliance with Ken and invelos:
http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=430575&PageNum=3&messageID=1178884#M1178884.
Ken's statement on Uncredited Cast and my rationale for removing them:
http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=203219&PageNum=1&messageID=410114#M410114.
New scans for your consideration. The colors are much more accurate. For example, the covers are more aqua than the current blue and the sand on the bottom front should be white not gray. More data is also visible. Look at the left center back cover above the raised foot." |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Kathy you keep digging your hole deeper. As I said in my note accompanying my yes, I asked for a simple sentence and instead I get a diatribe...really? I even described the sentence here Maclachlan is as credited invelos system is changing cap. That other users have info needed to determine if they want to follow as credited locally or the online., J. Do.instead you use the contribution system to launch an ill advised and ill informe attack on another user, fine 4 star behavior. Why ill informed because you called Mr the original conttribitor . Was I probably not , my data aS a part of the mass migration from intervocative, as such do i know the data as is is correct to as credited, no, I can say probably that's all. But it is that poorly informed information that allows to call others things liar.  | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
| | Registered: March 11, 2009 | | Posts: 211 |
| | Posted: | | | | Locking per op's request. |
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1... 3 4 5 Previous Next
|
|
|