Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1... 3 4 5 6 7  Previous   Next
De-Lovely "Musical Performers" Divider or not
Author Message
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTheMadMartian
Alien with an attitude
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 13,201
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:
Quote:
There was a time when just like every other user I used IMDb, but stopped when it was discovered that Ken had forbidden their use. That does not mean that you will find none of the old data, just like you may still find some of the old Group W  prelim to the Rules.

For the record, I have never used IMDb data.  Why?  Because the old Intervocative guidelines said, and I quote, "The actor names and roles played should be those listed in the DVD credits, in the same order listed."  You may have chosen to violate the guidelines, but I certainly did not.
No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar
 Last edited: by TheMadMartian
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
LOL, I always wondered whether Ken had edited the Guidelines or that had somehow been overlooked, even YOU never mentioned it. All I can say is as soon as I discovered it i figured ot the correct answer. I don't, however recall the guidelines stating to use the DVD credits, just not to use IMDb.
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Alien Redrum:
Quote:
This thread went 0 to epic in 2 pages. 

Alien:

If you children would grow up and act like adults instead like a bunch schoolyard brats trying to settle some perceived score, then the atmosphere here would improve immensely
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorsamuelrichardscott
Registered: September 18, 2008
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 2,650
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
The atmosphere here improved immensely for a week or so not to long ago but I have no idea why...
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTheMadMartian
Alien with an attitude
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 13,201
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:
Quote:
LOL, I always wondered whether Ken had edited the Guidelines or that had somehow been overlooked, even YOU never mentioned it. All I can say is as soon as I discovered it i figured ot the correct answer. I don't, however recall the guidelines stating to use the DVD credits, just not to use IMDb.

I never mentioned what?  That the guidelines told us to use the DVD credits?  What reason would I have had to mention it prior to this?  The guidelines never told us we couldn't use IMDb, only that we couldn't use IMDb style roman numerals.  If you think about it, why would they?  There is no reason to tell us not to use IMdb, when we are already being told we have to use the DVD credits.
No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,733
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
Just how many of his 5023 contributions are going to have to be fixed? Just how much damage has he done to the database? 

Over the years, I have personally fixed at least a hundred different profiles submitted by him that had cast and crew mined from IMDb. I'm sure there are many, many more, and the really bad thing is that users often look to American R1 profiles to clone cast and crew from, meaning that this data has been copied to many more profiles throughout the various regions and localities. I've never publicly called him out on those occasions, but it has always struck me as kind of funny that he's been attacking me for years - although never for anything else than me following the rules and/or contributing correct data, of course - while singlehandedly being responsible for a rather large chunk of the IMDb-mined cast and crew in our database.

Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:
Quote:
the move to Invelos was an auotmated process.

As others have pointed out: no, it was not. Instead, each and every profile in the Invelos database was manually submitted by the users. I'm sure many people submitted some unchecked data during that "rush" to get the new database populated, and Ken needed the new database filled so he didn't bother with requiring contribution notes, so all in all I'm not exactly blaming you. But don't hide behind the claim that it was an automated process. It wasn't. Additionally, as we've seen here, you've still been submitting the same old unchecked IMDb-mined data at least up until 2008, and quite possibly long after that, too, while calling it "STRICTLY As Credited" in your notes. Now that's where I do begin to blame you.
 Last edited: by T!M
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting TheMadMartian:
Quote:
Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:
Quote:
LOL, I always wondered whether Ken had edited the Guidelines or that had somehow been overlooked, even YOU never mentioned it. All I can say is as soon as I discovered it i figured ot the correct answer. I don't, however recall the guidelines stating to use the DVD credits, just not to use IMDb.

I never mentioned what?  That the guidelines told us to use the DVD credits?  What reason would I have had to mention it prior to this?  The guidelines never told us we couldn't use IMDb, only that we couldn't use IMDb style roman numerals.  If you think about it, why would they?  There is no reason to tell us not to use IMdb, when we are already being told we have to use the DVD credits.

There I don't agree, not at all. They did, in fact expressly forbid the use of IMDb, and as UI said I don't know if it was cchange Ken had made or just had been overlooked and still don't
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,733
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:
Quote:
They did

No, they didn't. TheMadMartian's statement on this is 100% accurate: the guidelines told us to take cast and crew from the credits, and additionally, they specifically said not to use IMDb-style roman numerals.
 Last edited: by T!M
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting T!M:
Quote:
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
Just how many of his 5023 contributions are going to have to be fixed? Just how much damage has he done to the database? 

Over the years, I have personally fixed at least a hundred different profiles submitted by him that had cast and crew mined from IMDb. I'm sure there are many, many more, and the really bad thing is that users often look to American R1 profiles to clone cast and crew from, meaning that this data has been copied to many more profiles throughout the various regions and localities. I've never publicly called him out on those occasions, but it has always struck me as kind of funny that he's been attacking me for years - although never for anything else than me following the rules and/or contributing correct data, of course - while singlehandedly being responsible for a rather large chunk of the IMDb-mined cast and crew in our database.

Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:
Quote:
the move to Invelos was an auotmated process.

As others have pointed out: no, it was not. Instead, each and every profile in the Invelos database was manually submitted by the users. I'm sure many people submitted some unchecked data during that "rush" to get the new database populated, and Ken needed the new database filled so he didn't bother with requiring contribution notes, so all in all I'm not exactly blaming you. But don't hide behind the claim that it was an automated process. It wasn't. Additionally, as we've seen here, you've still been submitting the same old unchecked IMDb-mined data at least up until 2008, and quite possibly long after that, too, while calling it "STRICTLY As Credited" in your notes. Now that's where I do begin to blame you.

Yes, Tim it was an automated process. There was a very specific procedure that ken passed onto a few users that completely automated the process to facilitate the setup of the bew database at Invelos. He had not yet ported over from Intervocative, we started from scratch and 100,000 titles overnight. you don't do that without automation. You believe that you knoqw eve4ythingb andn you know very little Tim
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Tim:

You are acting like a child, grow up. The Martian is NOT correct. It is Ken's express forbidding of IMDb usage that led directly to the development of the Rules.  Once again this is something that you weren't involved in and yet you know more than i do, just like the automated upload you weren't told, so of course you wouldn't think that there was one, it took about 4 hours to upload my entire library at that time, some of them were not accepted because one of the other users had gotten theirs in first..


Man, it's incredible, tim how much you THINK y7ou know and you know so very little
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,733
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:
Quote:
Yes, Tim it was an automated process.

No, it was not.

Quote:
There was a very specific procedure that ken passed onto a few users that completely automated the process to facilitate the setup of the bew database at Invelos.

Definitely not. Here are the actual facts instead: Ken made a public announcement here at the forums, and everyone started contributing like crazy. 

Quote:
He had not yet ported over from Intervocative, we started from scratch and 100,000 titles overnight. you don't do that without automation.

Again, decidedly not true. Each and everyone of the profiles contributed in March 2007 listed with "New Contribution" as it's contribution notes, was manually submitted, one by one, by the users. Only long after, when the dust from the Intervocative-Invelos-transition had settled, did Ken go back and port over profiles that hadn't been manually submitted. Those profiles can be recognized for having no initial contribution notes (not even "New Contribution") at all.

Quote:
You believe that you knoqw eve4ythingb andn you know very little Tim

Well, I certainly know this, 'cause I was there. I'm sure many users, not to mention Ken himself, will be able to confirm this, as what I just described is exactly what happened, and you either don't remember, or else your claims are just blatant lies.
 Last edited: by T!M
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,733
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:
Quote:
it took about 4 hours to upload my entire library at that time, some of them were not accepted because one of the other users had gotten theirs in first..

Same here - wasn't "limited" at all. "You weren't told" - ha, don't make me laugh: pure and utter nonsense... Again: this was the manual, one by one contributing of new profiles into the database I was talking about. I was doing the exact same thing that day. And you're now contradicting yourself: either it's an automated process, or you've spent those "4 hours" manually contributing them - so which is it, hm? There you go: it was clearly *not* an automated process - you, me, and many others, were contributing all those profiles manually.

The difference was that many of yours still contained IMDb-mined data, often even after the original profile at Intervocative had been fixed long before. Since you apparently never accepted (many of those) updates, and then went on to submit your old IMDb-mined data into the Invelos database, you actually set us back! In those cases we already had "as credited" data back at Intervocative, and you replaced it with IMDb-mined data here at Invelos. I vividly remember public dissappointment about that back in the day.
 Last edited: by T!M
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collection
Forum Moderator: Removed
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
 Last edited: by Forum Moderator
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collection
Tim: Auotmated means you set it up and walk away from it, you evidently weren't given that option. My collection  is far larger than yours, back when you used to allow people to see your collection, so yeaf it probably did take you four hours because you weren't provided the automatic option. Forum Moderator: Removed
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
 Last edited: by Forum Moderator
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantAlien Redrum
Proudly blocked by liars.
Registered: August 23, 2008
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 1,656
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collection
Quoting samuelrichardscott:
Quote:
The atmosphere here improved immensely for a week or so not to long ago but I have no idea why...


Maybe you should check your private messages. 

Quoting Skip:
Quote:
Forum Moderator: Removed quote



Insults and threats. Classy.
Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com

"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo.
 Last edited: by Forum Moderator
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,733
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:
Quote:
Before i really comne down on you, it was indeed an automated process that Ken referred a handful users to including myself, how big that handful was i don;'t know. But evidently you weren't included, that's too bad, but it is very normal for YOU to pretend that you know far more than you do.

Again: this is a blatant lie. Everybody who was around back then, including Ken, will be able to confirm that. It was NOT limited at all - Ken made a public post here asking us to populate the database, and lots of did that, myself included.

Quote:
Fair warning to Ken my patience with these fools is out.

Yeah? Well, my patience with you is running out...
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1... 3 4 5 6 7  Previous   Next