| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 3,197 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote:
Quoting MikaLove:
Quote:
And then we have an error.
Do we? I'm not entirely sure about that. Since MikaLove is arguing that SF is not a proper company name, we can't use it on its own. We need to use Svensk Filmindustri, but that doesn't exist in Norway. Should we really make up fantasy data that isn't there? On the other hand, if SF is a proper company name, it can be used in Sweden too. Which makes them interchangeable to me. I'm open to both ideas but we can't have one standard for Sweden and another for Norway... | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
| Registered: May 2, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 490 |
| | Posted: | | | | My definite conclusion from this debate(?) is that we are to use Svensk Filmindustri, Sveriges Television and SF Norge.
The only next step to solve any disagreements would be to contact the respective companies. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 906 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote:
Quoting whispering:
Quote:
...and for SF:
Aktiebolaget Svensk Filmindustri
556003-5213
Svensk Filmindustri International AB
556540-3937
I just saw your edit, did you find anything for SF Norge? You can find SF Norge at the Norwegian equivalent of that site, Brønnøysundregisteret, brreg.no. http://w2.brreg.no/enhet/sok/detalj.jsp?orgnr=947714732 Organisasjonsnummer: 947 714 732 Navn/foretaksnavn: SF NORGE AS And of course, SF Norge's website is www.sfnorge.no and they use SF Norge, never just SF. | | | 
The colour of her eyes, were the colour of insanity | | | | Last edited: by reybr |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,197 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting MikaLove: Quote:
My definite conclusion from this debate(?) is that we are to use Svensk Filmindustri, Sveriges Television and SF Norge.
Works for me. Although it might conflict with the rules. But we allow for Company in some names so why not make an exception here too. | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
| Registered: May 2, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 490 |
| | Posted: | | | | ... | | | | Last edited: by MikaLove |
|
| Registered: May 2, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 490 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Kinoniki: Quote:
Works for me. Although it might conflict with the rules. But we allow for Company in some names so why not make an exception here too. Oh so you DO read. Then you can ignore my other post. But it just pisses me off when people have nonsense arguments for quite logical things. |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting MikaLove: Quote:
Quoting Kinoniki:
Quote:
Since MikaLove is arguing that SF is not a proper company name, we can't use it on its own. We need to use Svensk Filmindustri, but that doesn't exist in Norway. Should we really make up fantasy data that isn't there? On the other hand, if SF is a proper company name, it can be used in Sweden too. Which makes them interchangeable to me. I'm open to both ideas but we can't have one standard for Sweden and another for Norway...
Your argumentation sucks. Plus you don't read what is written properly. I know english isn't your first language, but this really isn't a healthy way to argue your point. Whether you agree with Kinoniki or not, there's no need to talk like that. |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting reybr: Quote:
You can find SF Norge at the Norwegian equivalent of that site, Brønnøysundregisteret, brreg.no.
http://w2.brreg.no/enhet/sok/detalj.jsp?orgnr=947714732
Organisasjonsnummer: 947 714 732
Navn/foretaksnavn: SF NORGE AS
And of course, SF Norge's website is www.sfnorge.no and they use SF Norge, never just SF. Thanks for that. So would you say that SF Norge is actually the name of the company or is Norge a locality-specific suffix? Do these companies have the same relationship as Universal Pictures and Universal Pictures (UK) for example? |
|
| Registered: May 2, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 490 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote:
Quoting MikaLove:
Quote:
Quoting Kinoniki:
Quote:
Since MikaLove is arguing that SF is not a proper company name, we can't use it on its own. We need to use Svensk Filmindustri, but that doesn't exist in Norway. Should we really make up fantasy data that isn't there? On the other hand, if SF is a proper company name, it can be used in Sweden too. Which makes them interchangeable to me. I'm open to both ideas but we can't have one standard for Sweden and another for Norway...
Your argumentation sucks. Plus you don't read what is written properly.
I know english isn't your first language, but this really isn't a healthy way to argue your point. Whether you agree with Kinoniki or not, there's no need to talk like that. Well I was just pissed, but as you can see I removed that post. |
|
| Registered: May 2, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 490 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote:
Quoting reybr:
Quote:
You can find SF Norge at the Norwegian equivalent of that site, Brønnøysundregisteret, brreg.no.
http://w2.brreg.no/enhet/sok/detalj.jsp?orgnr=947714732
Organisasjonsnummer: 947 714 732
Navn/foretaksnavn: SF NORGE AS
And of course, SF Norge's website is www.sfnorge.no and they use SF Norge, never just SF.
Thanks for that. So would you say that SF Norge is actually the name of the company or is Norge a locality-specific suffix?
Do these companies have the same relationship as Universal Pictures and Universal Pictures (UK) for example? Do you need to ask that after I have said this so many times in this topic? |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,197 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting MikaLove: Quote:
Quoting Kinoniki:
Quote:
Works for me. Although it might conflict with the rules. But we allow for Company in some names so why not make an exception here too.
Oh so you DO read. Then you can ignore my other post. But it just pisses me off when people have nonsense arguments for quite logical things. Your humility is my inspiration. | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 906 |
| | Posted: | | | | I would say that SF Norge is the actual name, yes.
Compared to the relationship between Universal Pictures and Universal Pictures (UK), no idea as I don't know how close those two branches are.
SF (in Sweden) and SF Norge aren't that close though. | | |
The colour of her eyes, were the colour of insanity |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,197 |
| | Posted: | | | | BTW; there seems to be an SF Film A/S Denmark, too.  At least it has a different "proper name", SF Film, which can't be unsuffixed quite as easily. | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 | | | | Last edited: by Nexus the Sixth |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting reybr: Quote:
I would say that SF Norge is the actual name, yes.
Compared to the relationship between Universal Pictures and Universal Pictures (UK), no idea as I don't know how close those two branches are.
SF (in Sweden) and SF Norge aren't that close though. This is the problem I have. Universal Pictures were obviously the parent company, and at some point in the past they set up Universal Pictures (UK). However Universal Pictures (UK) is a separate company, it's not just a "branch" of Universal Pictures. And that's the problem I have here. In my limited reading it looks to me like both SF and SF Norge were set up by the Bonnier Group (do I have that right?). That leads me to think "Norge" is a locality-specific suffix. But I'm more than happy to concede to someone who probably knows a lot more about that part of the world than I ever will!  |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,197 |
| | Posted: | | | | Did Universal Pictures change their legal name to Universal Pictures (UK)?
Indeed, Bonnier seems to be behind all the different SF branches, including the Danish SF Film. | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Kinoniki: Quote:
Did Universal Pictures change their legal name to Universal Pictures (UK)? No, I believe Universal Pictures created a new separate company called Universal Pictures (UK). |
|