| Registered: January 1, 2009 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote:
Why not upload the proper profile, explaining to the screeners what happened and quoting the rule? Done by MiDiAN. Thanks for this.  Hope it gets through. I added scans and other informations to the Dread profile (Disc Id based). Taken from silentsigns contribution. (THX) | | | | Last edited: by VirusPil |
|
| Registered: May 16, 2009 | | Posts: 2 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quote:
Profile Contribution Declined Jun 10 2010 7:23PM
Image Contribution Declined Jun 10 2010 7:23PM well  It's not very impressive when Invelos don't care about their own rules. btw: i voted 'yes' this time |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | The Dread contribution based on Disc Id submitted by MiDiAN and the profile informations is just at approved.
Perhaps Invelos needs a second chance. |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | The re-change of the EAN profile to Cabin Fever was approved at Jun 23 2010. http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=444009&PageNum=LASTNow we have the first entry for in database with this EAN/UPC "correctly" as Cabin Fever. (EAN/UPC 4041658293501) The second profile "Dread" with the same EAN/UPC is in database with Disc Id I206D6C75D256C1D9. Thanks to MiDiAN for buying Dread just to add the Disc Id. Btw, would it be good to track such realeases in a thread, so users could get aware of double used UPCs and find the correct matching profile for their release better? |
|