Author |
Message |
Registered: March 10, 2007 | Posts: 4,282 |
| Posted: | | | | Don't forget to thank Martin for the layout idea. ![](/images/emoticons/smile.gif) | | | Invelos Software, Inc. Representative |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: ![Highest Rating](/images/Ratings/Small/4.png) | Posts: 13,201 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Ken Cole: Quote: Don't forget to thank Martin for the layout idea. ![](/images/emoticons/smile.gif) Did, did...he even got the IRL version of your virtual green arrow. ![](/images/emoticons/wink.gif) PS, I like the new yellow background to your posts. It will make them a lot easier to find. Will Gerri have one too? | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar | | | Last edited: by TheMadMartian |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: ![Highest Rating](/images/Ratings/Small/4.png) | Posts: 5,917 |
| Posted: | | | | Ditto. I rather like it. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: ![Highest Rating](/images/Ratings/Small/4.png) | Posts: 17,330 |
| Posted: | | | | Looks great... on both counts.. Thanks Ken... and Martin ![](/images/emoticons/smile.gif) | | | Pete |
|
![DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile Registrant DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile Registrant](/images/PUB.PNG) ![Star Contributor Star Contributor](/images/PSC.PNG) | Berak | Bibamus morieundum est! |
Registered: May 10, 2007 | Posts: 1,059 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | Berak
It's better to burn out than to fade away! True love conquers all! |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 1,982 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote:
I like the new yellow background to your posts. It will make them a lot easier to find. Will Gerri have one too? She have it too, just check one of her older post. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: ![High Rating](/images/Ratings/Small/1.png) | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: Quoting Martin_Zuidervliet:
Quote:
(wishful thinking)
It may have been wishful thinking, but it seems it was good thinking.
@ Ken, nice change on that. It looks much better. Big green arrow for you. I think by wishful thinking he was referring to the fact that he gave himself four stars! ![](/images/emoticons/laugh.gif) | | | Hal | | | Last edited: by hal9g |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: ![Highest Rating](/images/Ratings/Small/4.png) | Posts: 17,804 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Ken Cole: Quote: Don't forget to thank Martin for the layout idea. ![](/images/emoticons/smile.gif) Done! ![](/images/emoticons/wink.gif) | | | Thorsten |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: ![High Rating](/images/Ratings/Small/1.png) | Posts: 2,394 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Martin_Zuidervliet: Quote: Quoting ruineddaydreams:
Quote: actually maybe we could get it on a separate line either under the name and tagline, or even under the avatar? Yes, something like this:
![](http://www.geocities.com/firefox_1966/Reputation.jpg)
(wishful thinking) Wishful thinking aside, Martin, this was a great idea. It is a much cleaner presentation than the first iteration was. Hope you get the add'l stars, though. | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole) Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges. DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 100 |
| |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: ![Highest Rating](/images/Ratings/Small/4.png) | Posts: 17,804 |
| |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: ![High Rating](/images/Ratings/Small/1.png) | Posts: 1,911 |
| Posted: | | | | Don't forget, it was also partially ruineddaydreams idea: Posted: December 19, 2007 3:33 AM Quoting ruineddaydreams: Quote: actually maybe we could get it on a separate line either under the name and tagline, or even under the avatar? | | | Signature banned: Reason out of date... | | | Last edited: by NewEnglander |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: ![Highest Rating](/images/Ratings/Small/4.png) | Posts: 17,804 |
| Posted: | | | | Quote: Quoting pplchamp: Don't forget, it was also partially ruineddaydreams idea:
He received his award as well! ![](/images/emoticons/wink.gif) | | | Thorsten |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: ![High Rating](/images/Ratings/Small/1.png) | Posts: 3,480 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting ya_shin: Quote: ..and instead of yellow stars he made his own posts all yellow Yeah, that's cool. Gerri's too. They go beyond stars. They're SUPERNOVA's! ![](/images/emoticons/laugh.gif) | | | ...James
"People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess." ~ Dexter Morgan |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 36 |
| Posted: | | | | Just one little question (I don't know, if that was discussed before): I got my first bad reputation - based on a "No" vote I gave on a contribution (probably) the last week.
As I know, that there was no "No-Vote" which included any kind of affront or was against the Contrib-Rules, I ask myself... hhhmmmm... is there any kind of protection against such "bad reputation votes"?
Greetz... :-) | | | Ääärrrrrmin!! |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: ![High Rating](/images/Ratings/Small/1.png) | Posts: 2,372 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Mozo: Quote: Just one little question (I don't know, if that was discussed before): I got my first bad reputation - based on a "No" vote I gave on a contribution (probably) the last week.
As I know, that there was no "No-Vote" which included any kind of affront or was against the Contrib-Rules, I ask myself... hhhmmmm... is there any kind of protection against such "bad reputation votes"?
Greetz... :-) The only 'protection' against improper votes is Ken (or somebody) reviews the negative votes. If the reviewer feels the were not just the vote may be removed or even reversed and count against the submitter. Keep in mind they reviewer seems to use a very broad brush to determine if a negative vote was warranted. There have been many mentioned on these forums that most would not have rated negative yet were not reversed. If there is any way any one could see a post or comment as negative the vote will most likely stand. Another thing to keep in mind is an occasional negative vote will not hurt your reputation (per Ken). The system is set up to find a pattern of negative votes. That is when you are going to find yourself limited. I wouldn't take it personally. Most of those I have talked to have received at least one negative yet most of them have also earned a star. |
|