Quote:
Quoting Winston Smith:

Quote:
Hal:

Did the user follow the Rules...NO. Did your vote support the Rules, once again, NO it did not. That means the data was NOT correct.

It doesn't mean any such thing.  The film is, in fact, non-anamorphic.  The data submitted was to change it to non-anamorphic.  Therefore, the data submitted was CORRECT!

You cannot change that no matter what kind of perverted logic you attempt to apply.

If you want to argue that the contributor did not follow the contribution rules to the letter, you may have some wiggle room, but please stop with the nonsensical argument that the data is "NOT correct".

Quote:
Quoting Winston Smith:

Quote:
Quoting Alien Redrum:

Quote:
Quoting Winston Smith:

Quote:
Quoting Alien Redrum:

Quote:

Quote:
Did the user follow the Rules...NO. Did your vote support the Rules, once again, NO it did not. That means the data was NOT correct.

WTF?

You said that right, but then you were one who ignored the Rule. So, why would I expect you to say anything else. Man whatever it is are doing to allow for this kind unsupported crap...I want some of it....NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Just follow the Rules, bubba, that's all I ever ask. And unsupported data change is not correct data no matter how YOU choose to spin it.

What rule did I ignore? I have no idea what you are talking about.

I quoted it to you, amigo.

No, show me where I ignored it. I know the rule, I want you to show me how I ignored it.

Quote:
Tell me Skip, how do you defend this out and out lie in your contribution notes?

Quote:
DvddECRYPTER, dvdsHRIN and POWERDVD all see this as 16X9 anamorphic

Is this the kind of substantiation we should accept in order to vote "yes" to a contribution?

Quote:
This is the stupidest thing I've ever seen on this board.

The data is not correct because of the circumstances in which it was submitted??

That is the most idiotic thing I've ever read.

The data that is in the profile RIGHT NOW, is CORRECT.

The data that Skippy is submitting, is INCORRECT.

The notes that Skippy has used to support his change have been proven to be INCORRECT (meaning a) he's lying b) he simply didn't check or c) he doesn't have a clue how to use the programs he claimed gave him the information... either way... it amounts to incorrect and falesly provided information in his contribution notes to get his contribution approved).

Information has been provided in this thread to prove that the current information in the profile is CORRECT. Meaning, Skippy should withdraw his INCORRECT submission, adding INCORRECT information to the profile.

If this shouldn't result in a lose of contribution privileges, I don't know what should...

Quote:
Quoting hal9g:

Quote:
Tell me Skip, how do you defend this out and out lie in your contribution notes?

Quote:
DvddECRYPTER, dvdsHRIN and POWERDVD all see this as 16X9 anamorphic

Is this the kind of substantiation we should accept in order to vote "yes" to a contribution?

That's from the Original Notes, Hal. From many years ago, I'll trust that long before i will trust your igboring of the Rules

Quote:
mERRIk;

Your description is not quite correct. I won't insult or attack you using the words you did. But i will suggest relative to these boards that you go look in the mirror

Quote:
DUH! Hal, man you are brilliant. Thought I had you on that one, ROFLMAO, amd that information came from the old Intervocative files, bright boy.

Quote:
Quoting Winston Smith:

Quote:
DUH! Hal, man you are brilliant. Thought I had you on that one, ROFLMAO, amd that information came from the old Intervocative files, bright boy.

I don't care where they came from.  You entered them on the current contribution.  There is no way for anyone to know where they came from, nor should they care.  Your notes make claims which are patently false! 

Not to mention that what you are contributing is incorrect data in the palace of correct data.  That's really all that matters.