Quoting m.cellophane:

Quote:
Quoting ninehours:

Quote:
Quoting m.cellophane:

Quote:
My vote:

Jones & Steele = separate entries, no divider
Mears = include
Fitzgerald = no (stunt credit)
Dashaw & Davison = no
Stunts = no
Puppeteers = yes (this is no different than "additional voices" which are being accepted)

Agree on all counts apart from Fitzgerald, I don't want to enter extensive list's of stunt personnel but when a person is credited with a specific role/character then i see no reason not to credit them (even if it is a "stunt" credit)

Like "Stunt Double for Mr. Hanks" for (hypothetical) example?

No!, please don't put words in my mouth i said a Specific Role/Character in the film "Hr Hanks stunt double" is not a character in the/a film neither would "stunt stand-in for" I'm talking about someone who is given a credit for playing a specific character in the film

Let me just make it clear what i mean, i don't want to credit "Stunts" "Stand-in for" "Stunt Double for" or "Body Double" only stunt "Character/Role"

Quoting pauls42:

Quote:
Surely the fact that the word together was removed means that the intent is to include all the information from the end credits (and it was recognised the previous rule would exclude useful information).

I do my best not to look at intent as there is no way I can know what the intent was.  This entire section needs to be reworked as it simply doesn't make any sense...depending on how you read it.

Sorry i just don't get the logic here, we want the Puppeteers who are off screen manipulating a wire or pushing a switch to make a fang move or have their hand shoved up a puppet (or something  ) yet someone who actually appears performing on screen we don't    OK a accept defeat, you win