Quoting northbloke:

Quote:
Quoting scotthm:

Quote:
As I said, no big deal.  I'll try to mind my own business in the future and keep quiet when I see bad data being contributed.

I don't understand this attitude. Even though I don't agree with your final conclusion, I'm glad you've brought it here as you're highlighting a clear flaw in the rules and one that should be addressed.
I also completely understand where you and RHo are coming from: you are both assuming because this situation isn't covered by the rules, then it isn't allowed - which is a perfectly valid assumption to make.

The situation is covered by the rules at least for the main profile. The rules explicitly state where to put the info of the bonus, namely the other features film.

isn't it possible to create a child profile for the bonus feature using the Disc-id?

Quoting Sanuye:

Quote:
isn't it possible to create a child profile for the bonus feature using the Disc-id?

Technically possible if the main feature has an UPC. Allowed by the rules? Maybe. The solution to this problem? Maybe, until a bonus feature film is seen on the same disc as the main feature without an UPC.

Quoting northbloke:

Quote:
Quoting RHo:

Quote:
The situation is covered by the rules at least for the main profile. The rules explicitly state where to put the info of the bonus, namely the other features film.

True, but you have to remember until recently the rules didn't even cover the situation of 2 films on a one-sided disc! I believe this is a similar oversight - the rules simply assume there is a child profile there.

Do the rules cover two films on the same disc other than the remark for episode dividers? This remark does not say anything about which cast/crew from what episodes/films of a disc should be added. They simply state that if two films/episodes should be listed, that we should use episode dividers to separate them. But as a matter of fact we also do not list bonus episodes for TV series in cast/crew. Those are as well other features only.

Quoting RHo:

Quote:
Quoting northbloke:

Quote:
Quoting scotthm:

Quote:
As I said, no big deal.  I'll try to mind my own business in the future and keep quiet when I see bad data being contributed.

I don't understand this attitude. Even though I don't agree with your final conclusion, I'm glad you've brought it here as you're highlighting a clear flaw in the rules and one that should be addressed.
I also completely understand where you and RHo are coming from: you are both assuming because this situation isn't covered by the rules, then it isn't allowed - which is a perfectly valid assumption to make.

The situation is covered by the rules at least for the main profile. The rules explicitly state where to put the info of the bonus, namely the other features film.

Except it's not a bonus

Quoting Winston Smith:

Quote:
Except it's not a bonus

Sure it is. It is even labeled as bonus on the cover.

Quoting Winston Smith:

Quote:
It's a double feature inProfiler, even though the Distributor calls it a bonus.

How do you come to this conclusion?

Quoting RHo:

Quote:
Quoting Winston Smith:

Quote:
It's a double feature inProfiler, even though the Distributor calls it a bonus.

How do you come to this conclusion?

Try DUH!. Rho, I know how much you like to bloviate,but tryst me,Profiler is not rocket science,it is EASY until someone such as your self wants to create or attempt to create a controversy and the resulting chaos.point is once again you are wrong. I am sorry,son but them's the facts,we cannot create twos separate Profiles with ONE DISC ID,in other words two film son pone side of a Disc, there is but one way this can be dealt with.  I don't believe Ken could even come up with a program solution without going back to square one and rebuilding the entire program. Now, for once stop trying to confuse everybody, just this once. It is very simple.