Quote:
In short:
- Someone enter Van 't in the last name field: I accept it without question as that is the general rule
- Someone enter Van 't in the middle name field: I would ask proof as it deviates from the general rule

Quote:
Quoting Taro:

Quote:
In short:
- Someone enter Van 't in the last name field: I accept it without question as that is the general rule
- Someone enter Van 't in the middle name field: I would ask proof as it deviates from the general rule

This is how I treat all articles that I am aware of.  This particular one, probably because I don't see very many Dutch actors, I wasn't sure of.  Now that I am, I will vote accordingly.  I do have one other question...most articles I am familiar with are all lowercase, is it the same here or is the the 'V', in Van't, uppercase?

Quote:
I do have one other question...most articles I am familiar with are all lowercase, is it the same here or is the the 'V', in Van't, uppercase?

Quote:
For #024543509875 (the lone no voter wasn't TheMadMartian) already got approved:

Next in line #5039036036870 is more interesting, because it is in status Reviewing ('Reviewing' indicates the contribution is in queue to be reviewed by a second level reviewer).

Some may remember, John Davis' birthyear didn't have to do anything with the changes I tried to contribute.

Invelos writes:

--x--
These birth years have not yet been determined as necessary and should not be submitted unless they are required to distinguish between two otherwise identical cast or crew. Submit these only if you have included specific information about both actors. If you're not sure, just leave these unchecked and submit your contribution.

[ ] John Davis (1953)
--x--

I was not sure, so I left it unchecked and submitted my contribution.

I received three no votes: John Davis' birthyear is needed.

Still not sure, in favor of the users but against Invelos' instruction, I checked it the second time and submitted my contribution.

Quote:
Next in line #5039036036870 is more interesting, because it is in status Reviewing ('Reviewing' indicates the contribution is in queue to be reviewed by a second level reviewer).

Some may remember, John Davis' birthyear didn't have to do anything with the changes I tried to contribute.

Invelos writes:

--x--
These birth years have not yet been determined as necessary and should not be submitted unless they are required to distinguish between two otherwise identical cast or crew. Submit these only if you have included specific information about both actors. If you're not sure, just leave these unchecked and submit your contribution.

[ ] John Davis (1953)
--x--

I was not sure, so I left it unchecked and submitted my contribution.

I received three no votes: John Davis' birthyear is needed.

Still not sure, in favor of the users but against Invelos' instruction, I checked it the second time and submitted my contribution.

Quote:
Don't brag about getting a Contribution approved with such LOUSY notes. No documentation AT ALL.

Quote:
I am still wondering by the way, why despite Ken's comments what the pre-occupation is with "correct" names. Are you people using DVDProfiler for Genealogical tracking, or sending out Christmas cards. What possible difference could it bring to the program, except for those who will simply apply a default to unknown names waiting for some user to provide proper documentation, which was NOT done in this case. I though this was a TEAM effort, not everyone of doing whatever they choose and other users be damned.