| Registered: December 27, 2009 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 5,131 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting mreeder50: Quote:
Quoting ateo357:
Quote:
20th Century Fox Studio Classics
This is my vote, the individual movies will have their own titles.
As it's not defined in the rules, we actually are allowed to use [("common sense")]. There, that ought to get a response.  Blasphemy |
|
| Registered: June 6, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 950 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting mreeder50: Quote:
As it's not defined in the rules, we actually are allowed to use [("common sense")].  |
|
| Registered: December 27, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,131 |
| |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,852 |
| | Posted: | | | | If we are using common sense, then we will use both the rear cover and the spine to guide us in determining what part of the text on the front cover to use as the title. In this case that would be something similar to this:
On the Avenue / Pin Up Girl / Something for the Boys / You're in the Navy Now
If we are using an uncommon sense then we might imagine that it's something like this...
20th Century Fox Studio Classics
...which I believe* is mentioned neither on the rear cover nor spine.
---------------
* I do not have this particular release, though I do have others in this series and this is so in their case. | | | | Last edited: by scotthm |
|