Hal my note very clearly explains, "Correcting unsourced change to Video Format. Previous Contributor offered absolutely no support that it is not Anamorphic, just an undocumented claim." Wow guess you missed that.

And no Hal, unsupported data changes once accepted do not become correct. They are simply undocumented. Just as was this particular piece of very bad dats. Like I said Ha, particularly to you....disappoointed....yes, surprised....absolutely not

Quoting Winston Smith:

Quote:
Hal my note very clearly explains, "Correcting unsourced change to Video Format. Previous Contributor offered absolutely no support that it is not Anamorphic, just an undocumented claim." Wow guess you missed that.

And no Hal, unsupported data changes once accepted do not become correct. They are simply undocumented. Just as was this particular piece of very bad dats. Like I said Ha, particularly to you....disappoointed....yes, surprised....absolutely not

I don't care what your notes say.  You are changing correct data to incorrect data.  I  will never vote yes to that for any reason!  The data is not correct because it was accepted, IT IS CORRECT BECAUSE IT IS CORRECT!

Hal:

Did the user follow the Rules...NO. Did your vote support the Rules, once again, NO it did not. That means the data was NOT correct. All the prior Contributor had to do was edit his notes explaining how he determined the answer. Now as to you specifically 4 of the 5 tools I use rfeport this film as 16X9, 4 out of 5 and you and Alien are relying on one tool, hmm I think you and Alien both need to head back to the drawing board so that once the original data is restored, one of you can then rpovide properly documented sources to go along with your current imaginings, because that is all they are, they an unsupported CLAIM made by a user and you imagine it to be correct

Quoting Alien Redrum:

Quote:
Quoting Winston Smith:

Quote:
Hal my note very clearly explains, "Correcting unsourced change to Video Format. Previous Contributor offered absolutely no support that it is not Anamorphic, just an undocumented claim." Wow guess you missed that.

And no Hal, unsupported data changes once accepted do not become correct. They are simply undocumented. Just as was this particular piece of very bad dats. Like I said Ha, particularly to you....disappoointed....yes, surprised....absolutely not

Actually, if you had read all the notes, you would have seen this:

Quote:
Removed Anamorphic Widescreen. DVD is not "Enhanced for 16X9 Televisions" despite the back cover indicating so.

source: DVD

Evaluate this contribution

*Updated Notes*
Removed Anamorphic Widescreen. DVD is not "Enhanced for 16X9 Televisions" despite the back cover indicating so.

source: Watched the DVD and was disappointed it wasn't anamorphic.

So the last person to change it back to non-anamorphic was simply putting it back to what it should be. The info is already in the notes.

ROFLMAO, Alien I saw that, that is still not supported just more gobbledygook claim by some user. OOOOOO he WATCHED the movie and he KNEW it was non-anamorphic...give me a break. Where is the verification method

I can watch a movie and tell it's not anamorphic. Like The Color of Money, for example.

I'm quite sure I'm not the only one.

Quoting Winston Smith:

Quote:
Hal:

Did the user follow the Rules...NO. Did your vote support the Rules, once again, NO it did not. That means the data was NOT correct.

It doesn't mean any such thing.  The film is, in fact, non-anamorphic.  The data submitted was to change it to non-anamorphic.  Therefore, the data submitted was CORRECT!

You cannot change that no matter what kind of perverted logic you attempt to apply.

If you want to argue that the contributor did not follow the contribution rules to the letter, you may have some wiggle room, but please stop with the nonsensical argument that the data is "NOT correct".

Quoting Alien Redrum:

Quote:
Quoting Winston Smith:

Quote:
Quoting Alien Redrum:

Quote:

Quote:
Did the user follow the Rules...NO. Did your vote support the Rules, once again, NO it did not. That means the data was NOT correct.

WTF?

You said that right, but then you were one who ignored the Rule. So, why would I expect you to say anything else. Man whatever it is are doing to allow for this kind unsupported crap...I want some of it....NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Just follow the Rules, bubba, that's all I ever ask. And unsupported data change is not correct data no matter how YOU choose to spin it.

What rule did I ignore? I have no idea what you are talking about.

I quoted it to you, amigo.

Quoting Winston Smith:

Quote:
Quoting Alien Redrum:

Quote:
Quoting Winston Smith:

Quote:
Quoting Alien Redrum:

Quote:

Quote:
Did the user follow the Rules...NO. Did your vote support the Rules, once again, NO it did not. That means the data was NOT correct.

WTF?

You said that right, but then you were one who ignored the Rule. So, why would I expect you to say anything else. Man whatever it is are doing to allow for this kind unsupported crap...I want some of it....NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Just follow the Rules, bubba, that's all I ever ask. And unsupported data change is not correct data no matter how YOU choose to spin it.

What rule did I ignore? I have no idea what you are talking about.

I quoted it to you, amigo.

No, show me where I ignored it. I know the rule, I want you to show me how I ignored it.