| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote:
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
it can't be done for the online if it isn't the most commonly credited form of his name in the credits.
Better yet: even if he was credited mostly with "Sir", then the latest (inexplicable) rule change on honorifics would still dictate that "Sir" can only go into the "credited as" field... Very true... another rules update out of nowhere that I never understood. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote:
Quoting T!M:
Quote:
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
it can't be done for the online if it isn't the most commonly credited form of his name in the credits.
Better yet: even if he was credited mostly with "Sir", then the latest (inexplicable) rule change on honorifics would still dictate that "Sir" can only go into the "credited as" field...
Very true... another rules update out of nowhere that I never understood. Perhaps it is just a work in advance for a bigger change. (Oh man, seems I'm a very big optimist) |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | |  much more optimistic then me!  | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: July 8, 2010 |  Posts: 52 |
| | Posted: | | | | I posted this in another thread. There is the same problem with these two actors both born in 1961. Mark CurryMark Curry |
|