| Registered: May 20, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 2,934 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote:
Quoting CharlieM:
Quote:
Sound Re-recordist is an allowed credit.
It is. "Re-recordist", however, is not, and for good reason. See here, for instance.
Or here. Your argument in those other threads assume that Ken came up with all variances for everything that we use. By your argument "Production Designed by" is not valid because it is not in the table, even though it is another way of saying production designer. Now, I may very well contend that it should not be allowed, based upon usage, but it is again one of those that could be used in older films to designate a re-recording mixer. This even by your own admission. So I will add when I see. You can vote how you chose. If you want that to change, Have Ken make a statement or a change to the rules..... |
|
  | T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 8,733 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting CharlieM: Quote:
If you want that to change, Have Ken make a statement or a change to the rules..... As explained: I don't need to, since the rules as they stand don't allow it - and rightly so. So if you want that to change for this particular credit, have Ken make a statement or a change to the rules.... | | | | Last edited: by T!M |
|