| Author |
Message |
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting marcelb7: Quote:
Quoting Katatonia:
Quote:
It looks like all of the approved updates have now been released. 
Wheeeeee!  Nope, I don't think all are released. I don't know if it's a single example ,but still waiting to see this released, to vote the current cover contribution. Approved since May 15th.  | | | | Last edited: by VirusPil |
|
  | T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 8,733 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting VirusPil: Quote:
still waiting to see this released But that one is released already... |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote:
Quoting VirusPil:
Quote:
still waiting to see this released
But that one is released already... Oops, my mistake.  |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 2,337 |
| | Posted: | | | | Does anybody know what's up with the screening process now? I have still pending contributions which were contributed 23.5  Edit: Typo on date corrected | | | | Last edited: by Kulju |
|
| Registered: May 9, 2007 | | Posts: 1,536 |
| | Posted: | | | | Must be exceptional. I see some releases every day, and mine are delayed by 7 to 8 days. And new profiles within a day, as usual. | | | | Hans |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Seems everything going through pretty much on schedule here too. | | | | Pete |
|
| Muckl | | That's my common name. |
| Registered: April 9, 2009 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 858 |
| |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,201 |
| | Posted: | | | | Well, Monday was a holiday. Maybe Ken gave the screeners a nice long weekend off. I honestly don't understand the problem. So what if the profiles take a few days longer to get released? | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,550 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote:
Well, Monday was a holiday. Maybe Ken gave the screeners a nice long weekend off. I honestly don't understand the problem. So what if the profiles take a few days longer to get released? The way I read it, I think he contributed his in April... |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,201 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMovieman: Quote:
Quoting TheMadMartian:
Quote:
Well, Monday was a holiday. Maybe Ken gave the screeners a nice long weekend off. I honestly don't understand the problem. So what if the profiles take a few days longer to get released?
The way I read it, I think he contributed his in April... My bad. My last contribution released was May, 24 so that is the date I saw. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,733 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Kulju: Quote:
Does anybody know what's up with the screening process now? I have still pending contributions which were contributed 23.4 Certain "controversial" contributions, as well as those that contain new birth years, are promoted to "second level" Invelos review. They may take (a LOT) longer to process. For "normal" contributions, Invelos is currently working on those of May 25. Anything before that - except those promoted to "second level" review - should have been approved and released. |
|
| Registered: March 10, 2007 | | Posts: 4,282 |
| | Posted: | | | | FYI, the contribution in question is from May 23, not April 23, and it is in 2nd level review. This can now be seen on your My Profiler->contributions list as "Reviewing" for the status.
As a side note, those in reviewing status can now (as of today) be voted on. | | | | Invelos Software, Inc. Representative |
|
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,550 |
| | Posted: | | | | Ah, ok. Well that makes sense if it were May 23 and would be inline with the schedule. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 2,337 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Ken Cole: Quote:
FYI, the contribution in question is from May 23, not April 23 My bad, typo now fixed. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 2,337 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Ken Cole: Quote:
FYI, the contribution in question is from May 23, not April 23, and it is in 2nd level review. This can now be seen on your My Profiler->contributions list as "Reviewing" for the status.
As a side note, those in reviewing status can now (as of today) be voted on. How many weeks does this "2nd level review" take? It's still under "reviewing" |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 6,730 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Kulju: Quote:
How many weeks does this "2nd level review" take? It's still under "reviewing" My latest BY submission was on June 3rd and got accepted today. So either your contribution got lost on the way (which I don't believe), or there has to be a bit of research to be done, which might take a while. Not quite sure though how Ken evaluates BY submissions, except for the usual: sources, sources and (of course) sources. | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|