Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:

Quote:
Quoting TheMadMartian:

Quote:
Looking at the divider rules, I don't see where a blank divider is allowed.  It isn't an episode divider nor is it a group divider, so I agree with Pete.

It is neither allowed nor disallowed strictly speaking, Martian.

Once again
"Dividers allow the segregation of cast and crew into logical groupings. Wherever possible, these groupings should mirror the film credits."

Do we determine what the logical groupings are or WHY? I don't think so, we don't have that kind of knowledge. The filmmakers put in a blank space (Divider for our purposes),m do we know why or why not , clearly we don't, we can only say there is a blank space there, that is the factual determination or not as the case may be. A blank divider is as valid a piece of data as one which has actual data in the divider.

Skip

A blank is not "data". The rules give 2 examples for using dividers: episode dividers for episodes and group dividers for group roles. A blank is neither.

Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:

Quote:
Quoting m.cellophane:

Quote:
A blank is not "data".

That is your opinion...right?

Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:

Quote:
A blank divider is as valid a piece of data as one which has actual data in the divider.

That is your opinion...right?

Quoting m.cellophane:

Quote:
Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:

Quote:
Quoting m.cellophane:

Quote:
A blank is not "data".

That is your opinion...right?

Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:

Quote:
A blank divider is as valid a piece of data as one which has actual data in the divider.

That is your opinion...right?

Yes it is my opinion. And now because it suits you believe that the two examples are comprehensive and complete? We have an interesting and never stable interpretation of the Rules from you, james. It's whatever suits you at the moment...everytime. Sorry. This is almost funny.

So...once again you dismiss an different opinion, something which is always true when you cannot counter it. I never said you opinion was wrong, rogue or anything else intended to demean it. You have an interpretation and there is room for a different interpretation, that does mean you are right, it doesn't mean you are wrong. I will say however based on the number of times i have seen the majority BRAGGED about and the number of time s the majority has been WRONG or led us in the wrong direction, leaning on the majority is simply a way to avoid trying to deal with a valid argument which cannot be dispatched.

Skip

Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:

Quote:
So...once again you dismiss an different opinion, something which is always true when you cannot counter it. I never said you opinion was wrong, rogue or anything else intended to demean it. You have an interpretation and there is room for a different interpretation, that does mean you are right, it doesn't mean you are wrong. I will say however based on the number of times i have seen the majority BRAGGED about and the number of time s the majority has been WRONG or led us in the wrong direction, leaning on the majority is simply a way to avoid trying to deal with a valid argument which cannot be dispatched.

Skip

I have stated my opinion and not labeled yours or dismissed it. You labeled and dismissed mine as "interesting and never stable" and "whatever suits [me] at the moment".

Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:

Quote:
James:

You did dismiss my opinion read your quote again

"I agree with MadMartian and Pete. Not exactly a rogue opinion on my part."

You not only dismissed it, you implied by your choice of words that MY opinion was a rogue opinion.

And rick again I ask you politely, you are bringing absolutely nothing of any value or substance to this conversation please keep such comments to YOURSELF. Thank you.

Skip

      It's funny that you say something about James dismissing your opinion yet I post my opinion agreeing with Martian and you say I bring nothing.     

@everyone else. Don't worry. I won't play these reindeer games with the Dr. That's the last I have to say about it. I just found it  how he dismisses my opinion as "bringing nothing" in a post about his opinion being dismissed 

No divider. I don't see any reason to add it. Not in crew, not in cast.

I don't see any reason to use credited as either. They are just two people credited on the same line. They wrote it together but not as a group.

Writer: Pål/ /Øie
Writer: Brio/ /Flint

Quoting VirusPil:

Quote:
In cast it would be perhaps more interesting.

May i ask why? I personally don't see any added value but of course it's possible i miss something.

Paul