| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 2,759 |
| | Posted: | | | | Can you say "role name variants" and "functional equivalents"? Yes, I thought, you can.  |
|
| Registered: May 8, 2007 |  Posts: 823 |
| | Posted: | | | | Calls for a rule amendment. | | | | 99.9% of all cat plans consist only of "Step 1." |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 3,197 |
| | Posted: | | | | I have no idea what a super sound mixer does but I know what "original material" is. Funny how that works... | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 2,759 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Patsa: Quote:
I have no idea what a super sound mixer does but I know what "original material" is. Funny how that works... When the rules will be changed to allow functional equivalents, the crew table should be enhanced to describe the function of the job in the notes column as it already is the case with some roles. |
|