In this case I would leave it in and I am glade to see it pass. But in cases where you have a title with NR and a R version on the same disc you should not add the ratings detail.

Quoting bob9000:

Quote:
Hard to tell, the warning is attached directly to the Unrated box. I might accept this as a rating. On the disc in question, however, they are very clearly separate animals being placed far apart.

Where the rating is on the back cover is irrelevant. It is either we accept NR rating details or we don't. It still isn't an official accredited ratings board doing the rating if it is within the box under the NR rating, so I don't really see the difference.  For now though, since there isn't anything in the rules preventing them from being contributed and I have never seen or heard of one being declined, then I'm *assuming* at this point rating details for NR titles are allowed.

Again, I don't really care which becomes the accepted route, but at this point, the position of a rating detail on the back of the cover isn't something IMO that should be a distiquishing reason for whether it is acceptable or not.