Author |
Message |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,685 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting pauls42: Quote: it was stupid to include the 'As' - it's obvious that this is not part of the role.. I agree, but... "obvious" doesn't always seem to cut it here | | | My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users. Gunnar |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting GSyren: Quote: Quoting pauls42:
Quote: it was stupid to include the 'As' - it's obvious that this is not part of the role.. I agree, but... "obvious" doesn't always seem to cut it here | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: July 7, 2007 | Posts: 284 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting GSyren: Quote: Quoting pauls42:
Quote: it was stupid to include the 'As' - it's obvious that this is not part of the role.. I agree, but... "obvious" doesn't always seem to cut it here ROFL, how true | | | My DVD's
Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard drive? |
|
Registered: May 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,934 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting GSyren: Quote: Quoting pauls42:
Quote: it was stupid to include the 'As' - it's obvious that this is not part of the role.. I agree, but... "obvious" doesn't always seem to cut it here Have to agree with all... |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 366 |
| Posted: | | | | I'm going to disagree. The rules state "as credited". Just kidding. |
|
Registered: February 10, 2008 | Posts: 244 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting nolesrule: Quote: I'm going to disagree. The rules state "as credited".
Just kidding. Yeah... why profile according to the rules? We sure would end up profiling spelling errors in names and roles just because they are written in the credits too... Not to mention typos and wrong spelling on back-cover overviews which we of course don't replicate in the profile's overview - obviously we are not stupid According to the rules the contribution was correct - a negative voting on a correct contribution just because of personal dislikes is not - again according to the rules... But it sure is interesting how some people loose their manners and get insulting about just two small letters | | | Last edited: by MakoDeth |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,759 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting MakoDeth: Quote: Yeah... why profile according to the rules? We sure would end up profiling spelling errors in names and roles just because they are written in the credits too... Not to mention typos and wrong spelling on back-cover overviews which we of course don't replicate in the profile's overview - obviously we are not stupid
According to the rules the contribution was correct (...) No, the contribution has not been correct! The rules state to enter the role name and the persons name as credited. But the "as" is neither part of the role name nor part of the actors name the same way as the dotted line which can be seen sometimes "..." is not part of them. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,745 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting MakoDeth: Quote: According to the rules the contribution was correct - a negative voting on a correct contribution just because of personal dislikes is not - again according to the rules... But it sure is interesting how some people loose their manners and get insulting about just two small letters Ah, let me guess, it was your contribution ... which also explains the weird PM I got from you and didn't know what to do with it. | | | Karsten DVD Collectors Online
|
|
Registered: February 10, 2008 | Posts: 244 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting RHo: Quote: No, the contribution has not been correct! The rules state to enter the role name and the persons name as credited. But the "as" is neither part of the role name nor part of the actors name the same way as the dotted line which can be seen sometimes "..." is not part of them. Well I don't consider "himself" a "real" role name either... but that's just a personal impression. What about contributions stating "voice of XXX" as credited and getting approved... if it's just for role names it should be just "XXX" without "voice of"... And what do you say about the credits containing both dotted lines and "as"? Would mean "as as" too... Or why "real" rolenames come without "as" but "himself" with "as" in the same credits? God that's really getting stupid... and just because of two letters... one couldn't care less... |
|
Registered: February 10, 2008 | Posts: 244 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DJ Doena: Quote: Ah, let me guess, it was your contribution ... which also explains the weird PM I got from you and didn't know what to do with it. Good guess. And agreed, the PM looks really weird without proper explanation. |
|
Registered: May 8, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,945 |
| Posted: | | | | I think as As makes not much sense, one "as" is enough | | | www.tvmaze.com |
|
Registered: August 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,807 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting MakoDeth: Quote: Quoting nolesrule:
Quote: I'm going to disagree. The rules state "as credited".
Just kidding.
Yeah... why profile according to the rules? We sure would end up profiling spelling errors in names and roles just because they are written in the credits too... Not to mention typos and wrong spelling on back-cover overviews which we of course don't replicate in the profile's overview - obviously we are not stupid
According to the rules the contribution was correct - a negative voting on a correct contribution just because of personal dislikes is not - again according to the rules... But it sure is interesting how some people loose their manners and get insulting about just two small letters We do profile typos, but only if they are inside the name or role, or overview. We do not profile all the rest. If the screen reads "John Smith as Himself", we enter "John Smith" in the name field because that's the credited name and "Himself" in the role field because that's the role he played: Himself. If the screen reads, say, "Introducing Little Joe as The Prince", we enter "Little Joe" in the name field and "The Prince" in the role name, not the words "Introducing" and "as". | | | -- Enry |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 756 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting White Pongo, Jr.: Quote:
We do profile typos, but only if they are inside the name or role, or overview. We do not profile all the rest. If the screen reads "John Smith as Himself", we enter "John Smith" in the name field because that's the credited name and "Himself" in the role field because that's the role he played: Himself. If the screen reads, say, "Introducing Little Joe as The Prince", we enter "Little Joe" in the name field and "The Prince" in the role name, not the words "Introducing" and "as". OK, but playing devil's advocate here, how do we know that "As Himself" is not a real name, as in Mr. & Mrs. Himself's little girl Asturia (shortened to As in the credits). Yes I know it's very unlikely, but as has been said many times on these forums, "Who art thee to try and second-guess Hollywood actors naming strategies? Thou shalt input it as credited". It may even be a typo....and we all know that we enter typos, don't we! | | | Chris | | | Last edited: by Mole |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,759 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Mole: Quote: OK, but playing devil's advocate here, how do we know that "As Himself" is not a real name, as in Mr. & Mrs. Himself's little girl Asturia (shortened to As in the credits). All those special cases can be added with proper documentation. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,692 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Mole: Quote:
OK, but playing devil's advocate here, how do we know that "As Himself" is not a real name, as in Mr. & Mrs. Himself's little girl Asturia (shortened to As in the credits).
because we are not stupid and instead we apply Occam's Razor. | | | Paul |
|
Registered: August 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,807 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting pauls42: Quote:
because we are not stupid and instead we apply Occam's Razor. That is to say, usually the simplest answer is the right one. | | | -- Enry |
|