Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 519 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting VibroCount: Quote: Quoting Rifter:
Quote:
After seeing those quotes, and seeing the name with the title as a unit on the screen, there is no doubt in my mind that "Frank Capra's It's a Wonderful Life" is correct.
A title is more than just the name of a movie. It also serves to let people know its a specific version or from a specific director or producer. I can't imagine Cecil B. DeMille's name not appearing above the title of his epic films. It would be a slap in the face.
Wrong.
The name is above the title.
The title is the title.
But you've decided to rename the title to the title and the name above the title.
No logic whatsoever.
Wrong. I agree. The part I've bolded also says that it's not part of the title. | | | Stuart |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,197 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 1,777 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Junk data is a matter of personal definition, mdnit, which belongs where?
Skip No need to beat it into the ground with me, I'm converted. When I do profiles, they are for my personal use. If the online accepts them, all well and good, but I don't lose any sleep over it. Locks are my friend. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 813 |
| |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,694 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Telecine: Quote: Quoting Rifter:
Quote: Quoting Telecine:
Quote: Quoting widescreenforever:
Quote: aka "Frank Capra's It's a Wonderful Life" - USA (complete title)
Plus Columbia DVD House lists this title as the same in its data base..
At least I didn't try to name it The Greatest Gift as it was known before release date..
You can't be serious with this proposed title change.......read this:
DGA Article on "A Film by" Credit
See: http://www.dga.org/thedga/cr_gi_wga.php3
"Director Norman Jewison vividly remembers what Frank Capra told him at the historic May 1967 meeting of 53 directors who met to address the subject. "This possessory credit should be important to every director. Once you've earned it, it's more important than anything," Jewison recalled Capra telling him. "I remember Mr. Capra saying, 'My name above the title is more important than anything to me.' And then, of course, he wrote his autobiography called Frank Capra: The Name Above the Title.""
DGA Timeline on Possessory Credits battle wtih WGA
See: http://www.dga.org/news/v28_6/news_pc-timeline.php3
DGA Article on WGA Proposals
See: http://www.dga.org/news/v25_4/news_WGA_proposals.php3
The last article includes this quote from Alfred Hitchcock:
"I consider the possessory use of my name above the title of a film as of extraordinary value to the producing company as well as to myself. Every producing company has informed me that my name has 'box office value' and part of the benefit received by such producing company is the right to use, advertise and exploit my name."
- Alfred Hitchcock
The the film credits or in the 'credits block' on the back cover identify the title as It's a Wonderful Life.
Game over. Withdraw the submission.
After seeing those quotes, and seeing the name with the title as a unit on the screen, there is no doubt in my mind that "Frank Capra's It's a Wonderful Life" is correct.
A title is more than just the name of a movie. It also serves to let people know its a specific version or from a specific director or producer. I can't imagine Cecil B. DeMille's name not appearing above the title of his epic films. It would be a slap in the face.
It is a possessory credit. Capra's name appears above the title and he says so. I accept however that some of the strongest beliefs held by human beings are not based on reason. For example, some people honestly believe that the world is flat. The more enlightened of us know that it is a sphere of course but that soesn't stop some from believing that it is flat. Who the hell died and made you the title master? Take your condescending attitude elsewhere. As for have the guy's name above the title on the screen, where else are you going to put it? If he wants it up there like that, and his statements clearing show he does, then who are you to say otherwise? Just because YOU don't like it, doesn't mean that it isn't legit. | | | John
"Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice!" Senator Barry Goldwater, 1964 Make America Great Again! |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 1,777 |
| Posted: | | | | I thought the whole point of the statement was to highlight that even Capra was on record distinguishing the fact that his name and the title were seperate entities. It would be rather silly of the man to talk about his name in reference to the movie title if they were all the same thing. Obviously even Capra recognizes that his name isn't the title...it's above the title. Who are we to argue with Mr. Capra about the title of his own movie? For that matter, the copyright information is below the title but we don't argue about that. It's not that difficult a concept to grasp. You seem to be arguing that we should add his name to the title because it looks that way on-screen. That's all well and good, but the rules say nothing about extending the title. Which is probably for the best because stuffing that trailing copyright crap would become a pain. | | | Last edited: by mdnitoil |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Rifter: Quote: Who the hell died and made you the title master? Take your condescending attitude elsewhere. As for have the guy's name above the title on the screen, where else are you going to put it? If he wants it up there like that, and his statements clearing show he does, then who are you to say otherwise? Just because YOU don't like it, doesn't mean that it isn't legit. "...name above the title..." defines the title and that it specifically does not include the name. It's simple. You just don't seem to get it. | | | If it wasn't for bad taste, I wouldn't have no taste at all.
Cliff | | | Last edited: by VibroCount |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | I agree. Capra doesn't say that he insisted on having his name in the title, he said he had it above the title. Big difference. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Cliff: I am sorry your argument just doesn't make sense to me. WHHERE would the possesive be placed to qualify in your opinion, under the title, to the right or the left of the title, on the back with the title on the front. Skip <shakes head> | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 1,777 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Cliff:
I am sorry your argument just doesn't make sense to me. WHHERE would the possesive be placed to qualify in your opinion, under the title, to the right or the left of the title, on the back with the title on the front.
Skip <shakes head> Actually, I would think that you of all people would get this. If we parse the rules to the Nth degree, we find that the rule only talks about title. The mere fact that we're discussing name and title as separate entities means this discussion is over. Placement of name in reference to title? You yourself have just suggested that the name is divorced from the title by the nature of your question. I can be pendantic too, but it doesn't come easy. | | | Last edited: by mdnitoil |
|
Registered: April 4, 2007 | Posts: 884 |
| Posted: | | | | Cliff is absolutely right, the Capra quotes show that he thinks his name is NOT part of the title. If you can't see that you should go back to school or grab yourself a copy of "English for Dummies". | | | - Jan |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,680 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting VibroCount: Quote: "...name above the title..." defines the title and that it specifically does not include the name.
It's simple. True. Otherwise it would have been "name in the title". | | | My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users. Gunnar |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 820 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Rifter: Quote: Quoting Telecine:
Quote: Quoting Rifter:
Quote: Quoting Telecine:
Quote: Quoting widescreenforever:
Quote: aka "Frank Capra's It's a Wonderful Life" - USA (complete title)
Plus Columbia DVD House lists this title as the same in its data base..
At least I didn't try to name it The Greatest Gift as it was known before release date..
You can't be serious with this proposed title change.......read this:
DGA Article on "A Film by" Credit
See: http://www.dga.org/thedga/cr_gi_wga.php3
"Director Norman Jewison vividly remembers what Frank Capra told him at the historic May 1967 meeting of 53 directors who met to address the subject. "This possessory credit should be important to every director. Once you've earned it, it's more important than anything," Jewison recalled Capra telling him. "I remember Mr. Capra saying, 'My name above the title is more important than anything to me.' And then, of course, he wrote his autobiography called Frank Capra: The Name Above the Title.""
DGA Timeline on Possessory Credits battle wtih WGA
See: http://www.dga.org/news/v28_6/news_pc-timeline.php3
DGA Article on WGA Proposals
See: http://www.dga.org/news/v25_4/news_WGA_proposals.php3
The last article includes this quote from Alfred Hitchcock:
"I consider the possessory use of my name above the title of a film as of extraordinary value to the producing company as well as to myself. Every producing company has informed me that my name has 'box office value' and part of the benefit received by such producing company is the right to use, advertise and exploit my name."
- Alfred Hitchcock
The the film credits or in the 'credits block' on the back cover identify the title as It's a Wonderful Life.
Game over. Withdraw the submission.
After seeing those quotes, and seeing the name with the title as a unit on the screen, there is no doubt in my mind that "Frank Capra's It's a Wonderful Life" is correct.
A title is more than just the name of a movie. It also serves to let people know its a specific version or from a specific director or producer. I can't imagine Cecil B. DeMille's name not appearing above the title of his epic films. It would be a slap in the face.
It is a possessory credit. Capra's name appears above the title and he says so. I accept however that some of the strongest beliefs held by human beings are not based on reason. For example, some people honestly believe that the world is flat. The more enlightened of us know that it is a sphere of course but that soesn't stop some from believing that it is flat.
Who the hell died and made you the title master? Take your condescending attitude elsewhere. As for have the guy's name above the title on the screen, where else are you going to put it? If he wants it up there like that, and his statements clearing show he does, then who are you to say otherwise? Just because YOU don't like it, doesn't mean that it isn't legit. As the author of these comments: Quote: Quote: Quoting Rifter:
Quote: I respect people who stand up for themselves and what they believe in a hell of a lot more than I do those who constantly turn the other cheek just to avoid conflict, confrontation, and disagreement.
Quote: Sarcasm, hyperbole, and cynicism are tools of debate, as are logic and reason. If you don't understand how to use those tools, then you need to learn, or don't participate. But most of all, learn the difference between a sarcastic or cynical remark or comment and an actual attack; and learn the use hyperbole to illustrate absurdity or silliness. Most of the problems here, in my opinion, stem from that lack of understanding of those things. I would have thought that you understood where I was coming from. I obviously overestimated you. As to where I would put the possessory credit for Capra, nowhere. There is nowhere to put it in DVD Profiler in relation to the title. He has a credit as part of the crew and that is the best that can be done. | | | Last edited: by Telecine |
|
Registered: March 18, 2007 | Posts: 130 |
| Posted: | | | | I would easily say its not part of the title, the name it to highlight the director but it is above the title not in the title some rare exceptions to make clear different versions. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,692 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Cliff: I am sorry your argument just doesn't make sense to me. WHHERE would the possesive be placed to qualify in your opinion, under the title, to the right or the left of the title, on the back with the title on the front.
Skip <shakes head> I'm a little confused. Surely the point that everybody is trying to make is that the Possessive does NOT qualify. So the answer to your question is that if it is in your words to the right or left of the title then that means it isn't part of the title by definition. in order to provide some information which may help. I have included the front cover of my copy of 'Its a wonderful life". (or rather the boxset which includes this). EAN = 5050582308471 it seems clear that the Frank Capra is separate from the titles. | | | Paul |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting 8ballMax: Quote: It was never decided that possessives do not belong in the title. It was decided in the case of "The Birds" only.
If it's on the cover and credited in the film's opening credits as "Frank Capra's It's a Wonderful Life" then, IMO, that's what it should be. Unless it is a "Modified Title" or a "Foreign Title", the ONLY place to take the title from under the current Rules is the film credits. The Cover is irrelevant. Discussions and agreements on this forum are worthless until the Rules are modified to adopt them. | | | Hal |
|