LOL, JF.

Virus:

I concur with your lengthy assessment and personally I would prefer to see these issues discussed, cussed and recussed here, as opposed to look here, look there, look somewhere else in search of a title. From what I can see it looks to be Arthur 2 BTW, I can't see the other part, I presume it falls directly under Arthur. Based on your comments it seems a little odd even to me, perhaps, but the logic is based on, obviously, the 2 is in the same Font, size, color and even line as Arthur.

I believe that we should have one place from which to derive the title either the FRONT Cover or the Film itself and there is no exclusion of valid data , such as possessives, at least not on the basis of some or a majority of users wanting to exclude valid data. There are people who want that data, why is it OK for users to say no to any data simply on the basis of "I don't like it". I went into this in some detail elsewhere, I don't think i should repeat it.

BTW for those who would believe otherwise, because I never revealed it, welcome to Skip's side of the fence. Mean Girls it is.          

Quoting bbbbb:

Quote:
I think the only solution for Invelos will be to mandate a law firm, to formulate The Rules.

Or at least hire a legal scholar in full time, whose pre-employment test is to re-write the Title paragraph and propagate it in a contribution forum poll without "no" votes. And he better should not come out with 'spirit of the law' or something like that.

A mathematician would be a better candidate to write a text which can be followed by logic than a lawyer. Lawyers live from the spirit of the law and finding loop holes.