| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Kathy:
PLEASE. It had nothing to do with full and thoughtful consideratiion of his ideas. That eS done over 7 years ago when the rules were developed. Yves is upset that he did not get the answer he wanted to hear, it is really that simple. | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: August 23, 2008 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 1,656 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Winston Smith: Quote:
And we all know how good, bad or indifferent those that relied only on an only presence. The weakness of such a system is why none of them survived even dvdspot. The only surviving collection programs are designed similarly to profiler because it is a powerful model to work from. Profiler has become the best because it has both an online and a local system giving tremendous power to its users, the few that dont understand that or refuse to move from the model that they lost will be crippled. Its sad but its their loss, yes alien and Yves this means both of you to name just two. Your really need to get over dvdspot, you pathetic, pathetic little man.  | | | Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com
"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo. |
|
| Registered: June 15, 2012 |  Posts: 428 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Winston Smith: Quote:
The common denominator that I see is that neither of these have any real comprehension of db design or administration nor do they seem to realy care. Dont mean to insult anyone that is just an honest assessment of what I see. With no reference to this particular topic, but... I wish you wouldn't point to database design and administration. In reality a well designed database (technically) can easily accommodate all sorts of options simply by adding tables or fields etc to existing id's and supplemental id's. However I realise you are referring to "database design and administration" from the end user, requirements and rules point of view. It just annoys me when I see this statement  As to the topic itself.. it's use by date expired quite a few messages ago. |
|