Beyond silly, but wording counts it seems.
I had similar declines back in the day. Resubmitting them with different wording as always worked and all got approved eventually. Don't have thin skin, some voters are on crack, sometimes the screeners reject fine info or hit the wrong button, shiitake mushroom happens.

I'd state that you got them from the "end credits from the DVD".

Well... I can see where the confusion could be with those notes. Seen it come up here on the forum before. Could be the contributor used the case instead of the credits... could be they used a page of the menu. I seen both situations come up before. So just saying from the DVD don't necessarily mean they came from the credits.

So it is possible that the screener was going from past experience that "from the DVD" is not enough for them to approve it.

I don't have the disc to see what is being updated. But I do agree there. There shouldn't be any empty dividers used in the credits. I remember this being discussed on the forum before... and while I don't remember if there was anything said about it from Invelos... I believe most members agreed they shouldn't be used.

and an Empty divider is the end of the world, vs getting cast info into the profile.

That ok I pulled it. Won't bother submitting any more profiles.

Problem solved

-R

Quoting RobAGD:

Quote:
and an Empty divider is the end of the world, vs getting cast info into the profile.

That ok I pulled it. Won't bother submitting any more profiles.

Problem solved

-R

I'm sorry you are taking it so personally, instead of figuring out what was in error and resubmitting. 

Whether it was improper contribution notes, improper cast entry, divider usage or what ever.  There is a protocol, and the sooner you realize that, the easier it will be to make contributions.  There are 100's of people that make accepted contributions all the time, so it is not that difficult.

Your contribution Notes  "added english voice cast from DVD"

another way  "Added English voice cast from DVD Credits, per rules"

As long as there isn't anything else wrong, that should get accepted (barring an error from the screener, which has been know to happen)

If you decide to stop contributing, that will be your choice, and even though we may not get the additional updates that you may provide, we will have to live with it.

Charlie

It's not narrow minded. "From the DVD" could be interpreted to mean "From the DVD version" as often times releases are different on DVD than they were theatrically (or on TV, etc.).

Just simply say, "Added English voice cast from film credits per Rules". What's the problem with doing that?

For the record: I thoroughly hate the "per rules" addendum - I can't help feeling that's utterly ridiculous and superfluous, as all contributions are supposed to be "per the rules", obviously. It feels a bit like strolling through the park and constantly pointing out to people that you're doing so "per rules" - because you're not violating those "rules" by whacking innocent bystanders on the head or anything like that... If you're not whacking innocent bystanders on the head, that's great, but there's really no need to keep pointing that out to everyone. It's that ridiculous, IMHO, and the fact that I'm seeing people abusing the "per rules addendum" to add heaps of IMDb-mined data and other blatantly incorrect stuff doesn't help either. Apparently, they too have learned that when you include "per rules", it's all good... 

All in all, I'm perfectly okay with stating that I took something from the credits, but I try to avoid the stupid/redundant "per rules" tag.