Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2  Previous   Next
James MacDonald (1906) and James MacDonald
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registrantwolf359
D'oh!
Registered: March 17, 2007
United Kingdom Posts: 16
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I have come across an anomaly in the Invelos Database.

There are two actors with the same name of "James McDonald". One of them was born in 1906 & died in 1991, he was a voice actor for Disney & starred in the likes of Alice in Wonderland & Cinderella.

The second actor has starred in the likes of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Volcano and Home of the Brave. I have been unable to find a date of birth for him.

Because there is only one date of birth the James MacDonald (1906) is being credited with starring in Buffy, Volcano etc even though they were filmed after his death.

I have noticed that the 2nd James MacDonald has on occasion used his middle initial "G" when he has starred in things such as Broken Arrow & The Fan.

According to the CLT this has been used 71 times/155 profiles (this includes one incorrect credit for the Japanese release of Alice in Wonderland.)

The CLT cannot be used to check how many credits he has without his middle initial because of all the times he has been wrongly credited as his 1906 namesake.

I think it would be advisable that under the current situation of no DOB being available then his common name should be "James G. Macdonald". This would then differentiate him from "James Macdonald (1906)" and would lead to the separate actors being credited correctly, rather than the hotchpotch that is occurring now.

How do others feel about this idea & is it an acceptable way to proceed where two actors have the same name, but where one DOB is unavailable?

I would also like to apologise if this has been type of topic has been discussed previously.
 Last edited: by wolf359
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,733
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting wolf359:
Quote:
How do others feel about this idea & is it an acceptable way to proceed where two actors have the same name, but where one DOB is unavailable?

I agree that it would be helpful, but as it stands, this is not allowed as far as the online database is concerned. If his common name is "James MacDonald", then that's what we use - even if using "James G. MacDonald" would help distinguishing him from someone else. Of course, locally you can do anything you want, but for contribution purposes, his common name is simply "James MacDonald", while the other guy's common name for contribution purposes is "James MacDonald (1906)".

Why? Because the community as a whole would have no way of knowing that you, me or anyone else has decided that we're going to treat this as an exception to the "use the most-credited form as the common name" rule. To keep everyone on the same page, there can't be any exceptions, and the common name is always the most-credited form - no matter if a different name variant would come in handy.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAddicted2DVD
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 17,334
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Not allowed to do per rules... as you must use the most commonly credited for of the name.
Pete
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registrantwolf359
D'oh!
Registered: March 17, 2007
United Kingdom Posts: 16
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I have been studying the CLT and because the one James Macdonald (1906) is being credited with everything there is no way of telling which is the more common usage of the name for the more recent incumbant of the name.

That is why i think the use of the middle intial "G" is the way forward in this case, as the way it stands at the moment the use of his middle initial is the most common use of his name.

{Locally i am using a guestimate of his age to give him a DOB to differentiate him from his predecessor.}
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAddicted2DVD
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 17,334
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
You are not dealing in fact there. Ken said we can go against the CLT ONLY if you can document that it is wrong. That means... like many you see in this forum... you would need to open a thread to try to find the "True" most commonly credited form for him. You would have to list all his movies and seek help finding out what it actually says in the credits. Then if it is James G. Macdonald... then that is the only way it could be used. And if it is James Macdonald then that has to be it... whether we can find a birth year for him or not. The rules are in place for all... not just for the names that they work for.

There is many names that we only have 1 birth year for... but that don't mean we can ignore the rules for those names.
Pete
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorsurfeur51
Since July 3, 2003
Registered: March 29, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
France Posts: 4,479
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting wolf359:
Quote:

That is why i think the use of the middle intial "G" is the way forward in this case, as the way it stands at the moment the use of his middle initial is the most common use of his name.


I think you are 100% right. In my local, I have both James Macdonald and James G. Macdonald which is the best way to manage the problem. Unfortunately, the best way goes against the wish of some users who love so much the common name system and the CLT that they refuse any common sense solution that allow correct linking for actors (or non linking for different actors). For them, contributing per rules is the only important thing, even if they contribute wrong information. I think you have a very intelligent solution that have, unfortunately, no chance to be accepted here. This is the problem of that online database that has less and less signification as a database (just a collection of errors).
Images from movies
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registrantwolf359
D'oh!
Registered: March 17, 2007
United Kingdom Posts: 16
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
The CLT is wrong, how can a person be credited with an appearance in a film that was made 25 years after he died.

The inacuracies are creeping in because people are assuming that James Macdonald (1906) is the correct one instead of cross checking with other databases.

The other solution may be to have a DOD for actors that have the same name.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAddicted2DVD
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 17,334
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Once again... that is not per the rules that Invelos allows. For ANY exception to the rule Ken Cole has to say yes to it. No user can say we are allowed to do anything for the online database that isn't within the rules.

Once again... what you want to do is open a common name thread for him and see if he is most commonly credited as James G. Macdonald. If the common name thread proves he is then it can be used. If it don't then as the rules stand now you are looking at a local only solution.
Pete
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorCorne
Registered: Nov. 1, 2000
Registered: April 5, 2007
Netherlands Posts: 1,059
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Of course you can always correct the one's that are entered in the db with the incorrect BY by the James MacDonald without the BY.
Cor
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registrantwolf359
D'oh!
Registered: March 17, 2007
United Kingdom Posts: 16
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I tried that and it got changed back.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorhuskersports
Registered: September 29, 2008
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 2,547
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
You are not dealing in fact there. Ken said we can go against the CLT ONLY if you can document that it is wrong. That means... like many you see in this forum... you would need to open a thread to try to find the "True" most commonly credited form for him. You would have to list all his movies and seek help finding out what it actually says in the credits. Then if it is James G. Macdonald... then that is the only way it could be used. And if it is James Macdonald then that has to be it... whether we can find a birth year for him or not. The rules are in place for all... not just for the names that they work for.

There is many names that we only have 1 birth year for... but that don't mean we can ignore the rules for those names.


Agreed.  You have 2 choices: Open up a common name thread to determine the common name.
                                        Correct the inaccurate 1906 entries with supporting notes.
My one wish for the DVD Profiler online database: Ban or remove the disc-level profiles of TV season sets. It completely screws up/inflates the CLT.
FACT: Imdb is WRONG 70% of the time! Misspelled cast, incomplete cast, wrong cast/crew roles. So for those who want DVD Profiler to be "as perfect as Imdb", good luck with that.
Stop adding UNIT crew! They're invalid credits. Stop it!
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorCorne
Registered: Nov. 1, 2000
Registered: April 5, 2007
Netherlands Posts: 1,059
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I assume this was done by a user and you didn't change it into James G. MacDonald but just James MacDonald? Did you explain in the contribution notes why you removed the BY?
Cor
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,733
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting wolf359:
Quote:
The CLT is wrong

The CLT isn't so much "wrong" - it simply doesn't deal with birth years. If you look up "James MacDonald", you get all of them. That's just how it works - the CLT is really just a very basic tool, the results of which should never be taken on face value. This is just one of the many reasons why. Here, you'll have to manually establish which titles belong to which Mr. MacDonald. The CLT doesn't do that for you. In many similar cases, you'll find we've already established that using common name-finding threads, but there's always room for more of those... 
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorStaid S Barr
Registered: Oct 16, 2003
Registered: May 9, 2007
Netherlands Posts: 1,536
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting wolf359:
Quote:
The inacuracies are creeping in because people are assuming that James Macdonald (1906) is the correct one instead of cross checking with other databases.

The other solution may be to have a DOD for actors that have the same name.

That's even more complicated. Not only is DOD unknown sometimes, like BY, but some are actually still alive.

As for changing back what you changed locally, or people blindly accepting the actor with the BY, that may actually be DVD Profiler's doing. The so-called propagation of BYs is a very misty process.
Hans
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorhuskersports
Registered: September 29, 2008
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 2,547
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
After looking through the CLT, it looks like you'll have to establish a common name for James (G.) MacDonald.  It appears that the 1906 James MacDonald wasn't credited nearly as much with any other variant.  The 1 1906 James G. MacDonald credit is obviously incorrect.  I'll get that fixed.  It looks like James G. MacDonald will be the common name at first glance, but that will have to be determined.  I can start a common name thread for JGM if you like.
My one wish for the DVD Profiler online database: Ban or remove the disc-level profiles of TV season sets. It completely screws up/inflates the CLT.
FACT: Imdb is WRONG 70% of the time! Misspelled cast, incomplete cast, wrong cast/crew roles. So for those who want DVD Profiler to be "as perfect as Imdb", good luck with that.
Stop adding UNIT crew! They're invalid credits. Stop it!
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantGrendell
One disc at a time...
Registered: May 8, 2007
United States Posts: 823
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
James G. MacDonald is the solution.

Too bad it won't be implemented.

Agree 100% with Surfeur.
99.9% of all cat plans consist only of "Step 1."
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2  Previous   Next