It's a perfectly legal release which I also do own (9120026070465). As "In 3 Tagen bist du tot" and its successor ARE Austrian movies, it's pretty obvious, that there also is an Austrian "Filmladen" release for it.

One more reason to have a local database without outside influence.

PS: As MickeySpoon normally does some decent work on the database, maybe you ask him directly, what made him have this decision.

Without owning this DVD, I can think of a pretty good reason to delete this profile:

It was contributed for an incorrect locality (Germany).
For resubmitting this profile with correct locality highlight the profile in DVDProfiler and browse to menu "DVD -> Land ändern ..." Select "Austria" here, click OK and resubmit the profile afterwards.

Quoting TraunStaa:

Quote:
Would have been the better choice in the first place to simply contribute a country change instead of deleting the whole profile. Sheesh.

Unfortunately that is not possible. Changing the locality just creates a duplicate, still making it necessary to delete the original (assuming the release was actually non-existent in that country), and that is what the contributor did.

Quoting Staid S Barr:

Quote:
Unfortunately that is not possible. Changing the locality just creates a duplicate, still making it necessary to delete the original (assuming the release was actually non-existent in that country), and that is what the contributor did.

This is a major flaw in the whole contributing cycle then, when that's the easiest solution to change locality.
Examples like these also show, that one can add pretty much everything when contributing a first entry into the database, as nobody seems to check them. I always wonder, how many German and Swiss locality entries exist for the same UPC, when there surely never was a Swiss release.

Ah, now I see the problem. When I tried to add it again I had the filter set to Germany and therefor the correct entry couldn't be found. So this and the remark that the release is a screener caused the misunderstanding  for me. Thanks for clearing this up 

Quoting Staid S Barr:

Quote:
Quoting TraunStaa:
Actually, sometimes it is necessary to create a duplicate, since some (especially European) releases are for multiple localities. This can of course be achieved in different manners, but calling it a 'major flaw' is a bit over the top.

Yes, I know and your stating the obvious here.

But in said case, where only one country locality exists (if not someone creates a wrong entry) it's time consuming to first delete an entry with all data in its entireness and then go through the same contribution procedure once again, this time with a correct locality.

What is the rule that UPC/EAN/DiscID and locality can't be changed anymore, for? If the mysterious "screeners" would do their job on first contributions thorough, we could throw this, in my opinion, useless rule overboard and the database wouldn't have that many incorrect locality entries in there anyway.

Quoting TraunStaa:

Quote:
(...) I always wonder, how many German and Swiss locality entries exist for the same UPC, when there surely never was a Swiss release.

How do you come to the conclusion that there is no Swiss release for those UPCs? Only because the UPC and cover does completely match the corresponding German release, does not mean that this is not an official Swiss release as well with its own release date and SRP.

On the other side, an Austrian (or Swiss) release of a title which is prohibited in Germany, can't be a German release. But I do not know, if "In 3 Tagen bist du tot" is prohibited in Germany. If it has "only" been put on the index, it could still be a German release though, at least theoretically.

Quoting TraunStaa:

Quote:
(if not someone creates a wrong entry) it's time consuming to first delete an entry with all data in its entireness and then go through the same contribution procedure once again, this time with a correct locality.

What, exactly, do you expect the screeners to do?  Check every locality to see if a title actually exists?  I am sorry, but the screeners are doing exactly what they can do...trust the users to contribute profiles for things that actually exist.