| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 2,337 |
| | Posted: | | | | From wikipedia: "Malpaso Productions, originally known as The Malpaso Company, is Clint Eastwood's production company." Question is, per rules, should we omit word "Company"?  |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 13,201 |
| | Posted: | | | | In this context, it is not a company suffix, it is part of the company name...'The Malposo' makes no sense. Because of that, it should not be omitted. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 2,337 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote:
In this context, it is not a company suffix, it is part of the company name...'The Malposo' makes no sense. Because of that, it should not be omitted. I agree with you. Unfortunately no other voters except me thinks this way when it comes to this UPC: 7-321900-115247 Dirty Harry contribution. We'll see how it goes... |
|
| Registered: September 30, 2008 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 1,805 |
| | Posted: | | | | Just because a company has the word Company at the end of it's name, doesn't automatically make it a suffix. In this case, I fully agree with the Martian. In this context, it's not a company suffix and therefore should be entered as The Malposo Company. | | | | The night is calling. And it whispers to me soflty come and play. |
|
| Registered: November 24, 2008 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 1,275 |
| |
  | T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 8,733 |
| | Posted: | | | | Not a suffix, no. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 20,111 |
| | Posted: | | | | I agree, it's certainly not a Suffix.
"The Malpaso" would simply make no sense at all. | | | | Corey |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Let's remember that like many production companies, Malpaso HAS undergone name changes. There are some that are legitimately Malpaso Company (I think this was early company history) and later became The Malpaso Company and even some that may list Malpaso Productions. | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Kulju: Quote:
From wikipedia:
"Malpaso Productions, originally known as The Malpaso Company, is Clint Eastwood's production company."
Where do we take company names from? Wikipedia? Quote:
Question is, per rules, should we omit word "Company"? Well, Company is suffixed to Malpaso, isn't it? Anyway, be careful, if you do not match the choice of the masses you'll lose your reputation (in the eyes of Invelos, that is). You're right, of course. But my votes are bound to an unspoken gentlemen's agreement with the contributor. | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
| Registered: April 3, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 1,998 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Katatonia: Quote:
I agree, it's certainly not a Suffix.
"The Malpaso" would simply make no sense at all. I don't think it changes anything but the contributor is not changing "The Malpaso Company" to "The Malpaso" but is changing it from "Malpaso Company" to just "Malpaso" |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 3,197 |
| | Posted: | | | | Looks like an abbreviation to me, which the rules forbid. But I would go with the on-screen credit, if it's just Malpaso I would enter that because I don't have any other knowledge to dispute it. | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 | | | | Last edited: by Nexus the Sixth |
|
| Registered: April 3, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,998 |
| | Posted: | | | | Just had a look and the on screen credit (Opening Credits) is
In
A Malpaso Company
Production |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Business suffiixes are almost always abbreviated. Such as Co., Inc, etc.I presume that Malpaso Company is the Company name.Would The Limited be called The, because some joker believes Limited to be a suffix, I have news for you in this case it very definitely is NOT. What is Clint Eastwood saying by spelling out Malpaso Company, is it a suffix or not, I don't know I haven't asked him. Nick would you similarly aasume that that Smith, Jones and Company would also be a suffix. Rather simplistic thinking,I think. | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video | | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
|
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,733 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting ninehours: Quote:
Just had a look and the on screen credit (Opening Credits) is
In
A Malpaso Company
Production Not a suffix. |
|
| Registered: July 31, 2008 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,506 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Winston Smith: Quote:
Nick would you similarly aasume that that Smith, Jones and Company would also be a suffix. Rather simplistic thinking,I think. Ninehours isn't the one who is saying that Company should be removed. He's only stating what the contributor is doing. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | OK | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|