Just reread the rules and couldn't find anything about this special problem except for the "these groupings should mirror the film credits".
So, your additional information does not violate the rules (provided, of course, that it mirrors the actual credit), the wording might even support your approach. I still wouldn't enter it this way, but I surely wouldn't vote "No".

Let me quote The MadMartian from a previous discussion about this (here):

Quoting TheMadMartian:

Quote:
Quoting Pantheon:

Quote:
I've said before, currently both Visual Effect by Pixel Magic or simply Pixel Magic are both correct.

Actually, they are not.  I knew something about this was bugging me and, after going back to read the rules, I found what it was.

From the rules, bolding by me:  "List individual credits only, not company name credits. Exception: If a company name heads a group of crew, use the Group divider to enter the company name."

The rules tell us to enter the company name.  That's it.  They don't tell us to copy the credit exactly, just "enter the company name."  I can't believe it took be 8 pages to figure that out. 

Look: this is a very big issue. I'd say it affects at least half of all my profiles. I just can't have "either way is fine" - I'm sorry, but that doesn't work for me. This continued "well, you do it your way, I'll do mine" approach wreaks havoc on the contribution system: if both ways are okay, then no matter which way I go, I'll always have problems with half of my profiles. When the on-line variant of handling this differs from how I've chosen to do it, I'm virtually cut off from ever contributing any more crew changes to such a profile - unless I want to play ping-pong, or go through the ordeal of editing my dividers before contributing, and then fixing it right back. That really can't be Ken's intent.

Therefore, it has to be one or the other, and yes, the other has to be against the rules. Frankly, I don't even care that much which way we go - as long as we all go the same way. Either we all list the company name, or we all list the entire credit. Well, no matter how you spin it, the rules only speak of the company name, we've had a pretty conclusive poll on the subject in the rules committee forum (here), and we've discussed it great length several times. Every time, the outcome has been that the majority wants to stick to just the company name. Finally, there are also the obvious problems with field length when we'd try to cram it all in. That should also tell us something. Last but not least there's the concept that we never track any "additional context" for any of the crew credits. We've got the ability to store the actual credits locally, but they're not part of the online database. I don't see how this is any different. With that overwhelming support for just the company name, I'd say: let's just go with that, then, and strive for a bit of consistency in the database, instead of ending up with an inconsistent mess?

I agree with Tim and Corne,
consistency is needed, so even though Nick's approach does not violate the rules, it might not be helpful to enter this "additional information".
I think Tim pinned down the reasons for "company name only" quite well. And since we already seem to have poll-results supporting this approach, I don't see any reason why we shouldn't stick to it.

EDIT: I think it would be useful if Ken could enter the little word "only" to the exception rule. It then would read:

Quote:
List individual credits only, not company name credits. Exception: If a company name heads a group of crew, use the Group divider to enter the company name only.

Sounds a bit awkward, so maybe someone with better English can help here.

Quoting GSyren:

Quote:
If you interpret the last "the company name" as "only the company name", then you should do the same for the first occurrence. So, in effect the rule would be
If only a company name heads a group of crew, use the Group divider to enter only the company name.

???
This logic fails me

As long as the rules keep telling us to mirror the film credtis, we shouldn't be surprised when people actually try to copy them in every possible detail. That's why we get crazy submissions like empty group dividers. 

You've got it, Muckl.

My position is that you can't mix and match definitions. Either you take it literally or you don't.

You can interpret the rule as "If a company name is part of the heading of a group of crew then use the group divider to enter (only) the company name".

But you can't justify that interpretation by saying that the rules say "the company name" and nothing else. Because if you do, then you're saying that half of the rule is to be taken literally and the other half is not. You can't have it both ways...

That said, I'm personally not in favor of a literal interpretation, so I'm fine with the extended info.

The rules say to enter the company name, not anything else.

As for mirroring the film credits, that remark is about the grouping, in other words, when to include a divider and when not. But the contents of the divider should be a company name.