I recently submitted a complete cast/crew profile for Sympathy for Lady Vengeance.  Since I own 4 different releases of this movie, I submitted 4 separate profile submissions.

Lady Vengeance: Ultimate Revenge Edition Region A US Blu-ray (842498-000212)
0 Votes For      0 Votes Against

Sympathy for Lady Vengeance Region A HK Blu-ray (4-895033-768128)
1 Vote For        0 Votes Against

Lady Vengeance Region B DE Blu-ray (4-020974-165754)
13 Votes For    0 Votes Against

Sympathy for Lady Vengeance: Special Edition R3 Korean DVD (8-809086-115729)
3 Votes For      3 Votes Against

So far, there is 17 Votes for and 3 Votes against.  3 No votes were due to inclusion of divider in the main cast listing.  The movie begins with names of 4 main cast members in romanized alphabet and Korean without role names.  The end credits are only in Korean and list all cast members in the order of appearance with roles, except 8 cast members who are listed at the end under "Woojeong Choolyeon" which means Special Appearance or Cameo Appearance.  I listed the cast credit starting out with 4 main cast without role names, then added a empty divider, followed by complete cast listing with role names, followed by another divider titled "Special Appearance", followed by additional 8 cast members with role names.

The votes are interesting for many reasons.

1. There are so many votes on the German Blu-ray release
2. There are no votes on the US Blu-ray release (Best Buy exclusive until June 15, 2010)
3. All the no votes are for the R3 Korean DVD (I don't know what that means)

Quoting xradman:

Quote:
The movie begins with names of 4 main cast members in romanized alphabet and Korean without role names.  The end credits are only in Korean and list all cast members in the order of appearance with roles, except 8 cast members who are listed at the end under "Woojeong Choolyeon" which means Special Appearance or Cameo Appearance.  I listed the cast credit starting out with 4 main cast without role names, then added a empty divider, followed by complete cast listing with role names, followed by another divider titled "Special Appearance", followed by additional 8 cast members with role names.

You entered four cast members twice, from the opening and again from the standard film credits? Then I am unable to endorse your contribution.

I don't own this title, but I would have voted 'no' based on the empty divider as well.

Quoting paulb_99:

Quote:
If i understand you correctly you used 4 cast members from the opening credits and used them again, because they are credited there as well, in the end credits. You used a divider to show this

Yes, he did it this way.

http://s10.directupload.net/images/100530/ct4tf7pu.jpg

Quoting Wolfpig:

Quote:
Quoting paulb_99:

Quote:
If i understand you correctly you used 4 cast members from the opening credits and used them again, because they are credited there as well, in the end credits. You used a divider to show this

Yes, he did it this way.

http://s10.directupload.net/images/100530/ct4tf7pu.jpg

Thanks for the pic, seeing this i'd vote no. Although the rest looks good i think this is not according to the rules, if you remove the first four and the divider it be great,

Paul

Your comments are appreciated.  I withdrew all 4 existing contributions and made the changes some of you requested and resubmitted them for your vote.

For my personal database, I kept the credits as I submitted originally because I think that is closer to the original intent of the film makers in having the top 4 cast on top of the credits (the entire end credits are in order of appearance except the special appearance casts).

Quoting Alien Redrum:

Quote:
It's easy enough to fix it in my local, and if someone is going to make a huge correction with one niggle, all things considered, it's easier for me to fix one slight thing than 100 other things that are corrected.

As it happens, that's Invelos' policy as well:

Quoting Ken Cole:

Quote:
The Invelos evaluators' standing policy is to accept profiles that add significant value.  They do not have to be complete, nor even completely accurate.  If you're submitting 50 painstakingly correct cast entries but get the production year wrong, the profile should be accepted and corrected later.

Quoting Astrakan:

Quote:
Quoting T!M:

Quote:
As it happens, that's Invelos' policy as well:

Quoting Ken Cole:

Quote:
The Invelos evaluators' standing policy is to accept profiles that add significant value.  They do not have to be complete, nor even completely accurate.  If you're submitting 50 painstakingly correct cast entries but get the production year wrong, the profile should be accepted and corrected later.

That's good to know. Thanks.

He also stated that, ""No" votes are equally valid in this case, however.  They allow the contributor a chance to correct their submission if they choose, and save someone the effort of the correction later on."  For this reason, I always vote 'no' when there is an error.