| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 2,550 |
| | Posted: | | | | I'm going to work on the profile for Valentine's Day and the cast is split into dividers. Here's how one breaks down:
Other Los Angelinos
Character - Actor
Character - Actor
etc
etc
Character - Actor
Actor
Character - Actor
etc
etc
End
Edit: Now that I think about it, I guess it might be obvious but thought I'd ask. Would I place an end divider with those actors or what? | | | | Last edited: by The Movieman |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,550 |
| | Posted: | | | | Indeed they are.  |
|
| Registered: May 20, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,934 |
| | Posted: | | | | without going into a long detail again,, see my post here concerning limitations to divider usage |
|
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,550 |
| | Posted: | | | | Anyone have any ideas? Do I put a group end? I would assume so as there are no end dividers for the other 5 group dividers that proceeded.
Would it be:
ACM
Character - Actor
etc
etc
Other Los Angelenos
Character - Actor
etc
-- END DIVIDER --
Character - Actor
Actor
-- START DIVIDER AGAIN? --
Character - Actor
Character - Actor
(End of Cast Credits)
Would there be another End Divider after those two actors? |
|
  | T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 8,733 |
| | Posted: | | | | Unfortunately, no one knows. Which means: everyone does as he pleases, "first one in wins", and no consistency in sight. I warned about this exact problem when we were still in beta stage, but today there's still no answer...  |
|
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,550 |
| | Posted: | | | | (Sorry, I had posted that when CharlieM were posted his)
So in your set up, it would be:
Other Los Angelenos
Character - Actor
Etc
Other Los Angelenos - ESPN Radio Announcers
Actor
Actor
Other Los Angelenos
Character - Actor
Am I reading that right? | | | | Last edited: by The Movieman |
|
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,550 |
| | Posted: | | | | What makes this worse is after those two "actors" (it's Mike Greenberg and Mike Golic), there's only one other credit for the radio guy... *sigh* |
|
| Registered: May 20, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,934 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMovieman: Quote:
Anyone have any ideas? Do I put a group end? I would assume so as there are no end dividers for the other 5 group dividers that proceeded.
Would it be:
ACM
Character - Actor
etc
etc
Other Los Angelenos
Character - Actor
etc
-- END DIVIDER --
Character - Actor
Actor
-- START DIVIDER AGAIN? --
Character - Actor
Character - Actor
(End of Cast Credits)
Would there be another End Divider after those two actors? In its current programming limitation nesting group dividers do not work. Currently a group divider ends the previous group, so ends the nest. The only way I have found to wrok is Other Los Angelinos <---group actor - character actor - character Other Los Angelinos: Character <---Group:Supgroup Actor Actor Other Los NAgelinos <---Back to group actor characte actor Character end group you have to return back to the sub group with another group divider Charlie |
|
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,550 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting CharlieM: Quote:
Quoting TheMovieman:
Quote:
Anyone have any ideas? Do I put a group end? I would assume so as there are no end dividers for the other 5 group dividers that proceeded.
Would it be:
ACM
Character - Actor
etc
etc
Other Los Angelenos
Character - Actor
etc
-- END DIVIDER --
Character - Actor
Actor
-- START DIVIDER AGAIN? --
Character - Actor
Character - Actor
(End of Cast Credits)
Would there be another End Divider after those two actors?
In its current programming limitation nesting group dividers do not work. Currently a group divider ends the previous group, so ends the nest.
The only way I have found to wrok is
Other Los Angelinos <---group
actor - character
actor - character
Other Los Angelinos: Character <---Group:Supgroup
Actor
Actor
Other Los NAgelinos <---Back to group
actor characte
actor Character
end group
you have to return back to the sub group with another group divider
Charlie So what I did here: (Sorry, I had posted that when CharlieM were posted his) So in your set up, it would be: Other Los Angelenos (Group) Character - Actor Etc Other Los Angelenos: ESPN Radio Announcers (Group:Subgroup) Actor Actor Other Los Angelenos (Group Again) Character - Actor Is what you are suggesting? |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 906 |
| | Posted: | | | | What I would do is drop the subgroup, just enter them as normal cast. Since we can't nest groups, I feel that this gives the closest representation of the credits. | | | 
The colour of her eyes, were the colour of insanity |
|
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,550 |
| | Posted: | | | | Looks like we're going to get a variety of opinions. I've submitted with the subgroup that Charlie suggested, but I guess if I get more concensus or if Ken chimes in, then I'll adjust and resubmit. Personally, I don't care in this case as at no time will I look at what movies Mike and Mike were in (this is their first anyway), so doesn't matter to me where this goes... | | | | Last edited: by The Movieman |
|
| Registered: May 20, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,934 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMovieman: Quote:
Looks like we're going to get a variety of opinions. I've submitted with the subgroup that Charlie suggested, but I guess if I get more concensus or if Ken chimes in, then I'll adjust and resubmit. Personally, I don't care in this case as at no time will I look at what movies Mike and Mike were in (this is their first anyway), so doesn't matter to me where this goes... This was discussed Ken, I believe asked for input. I don't think that I heard a final ruling. The only thing I can tell you, is this is the way it works. You will have to decide. Charlie |
|
| Registered: May 9, 2008 | | Posts: 467 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting CharlieM: Quote:
Other Los Angelinos <---group
actor - character
actor - character
Other Los Angelinos: Character <---Group:Supgroup
Actor
Actor
Other Los NAgelinos <---Back to group
actor characte
actor Character
end group
you have to return back to the sub group with another group divider
This is the same as what I've been doing. Tom |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMovieman: Quote:
(Sorry, I had posted that when CharlieM were posted his)
So in your set up, it would be:
Other Los Angelenos
Character - Actor
Etc
Other Los Angelenos - ESPN Radio Announcers
Actor
Actor
Other Los Angelenos
Character - Actor
Am I reading that right? This is how I always done it. It was how Ken suggested (not the only suggestion... but the one made by Ken) in the Rules Committee Forum. So that is what I am doing... at least until a final decision is made. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,550 |
| |