| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 3,480 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting the negative vote screen: Quote:
Please note that negative feedback must be warranted, based on the message below. Invelos administrators monitor feedback and may elect to remove or reverse this feedback. Your own user reputation score, and the permission to rate others, depend on accurate feedback, so please ensure this post warrants negative feedback before continuing. Could we get some direction on when a post warrants negative feedback from the perspective of Invelos administrators? Is it only for violation of the forum rules or can it also include posts viewed by the voter as unhelpful, rude, attacking, insulting, etc? None of these are explicitly prohibited by the forum rules unless they rise to the level of "repeated harassment of another member." Since one's own score can be adversely affected by voting against a post that doesn't warrant negative feedback, it would help to know where the boundaries are. It would also be helpful to have a list of votes cast (much like the list of subscribed threads) so that one could easily locate them if there's cause to remove a vote after an edit, for example. After I cast 4 positive votes, I couldn't remember which posts I had voted for. You do see an icon on a post for which you've voted, but if you've left the thread, you might not remember which threads contain voted posts. Getting old.   | | | ...James
"People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess." ~ Dexter Morgan |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 5,916 |
| | Posted: | | | | I like the fact that there's no longer an edit button on every post. It was annoying accidentally clicking on it and getting the DENIED message.
Looks like the expiration on voting is from the post date AND time, nice touch.
I can understand that going to another page after casting a vote could be viewed as an annoyance and that's probably a good thing as it'll keep down frivious voting even if we have only so many that we can give. |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,916 |
| | Posted: | | | | If you vote for me, I promise to bring your favorite TV shows out from the dust of the past and released out on DVD, HD-DVD, and Blu-Ray. With your vote, I'll bring truth, justice, and corrections to the IMDb and see that every new contributor receives proper training. With YOUR vote, I can make a difference in the movie community!  |
|
| Registered: August 22, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,807 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr. Killpatient: Quote:
If you vote for me, I promise to bring your favorite TV shows out from the dust of the past and released out on DVD, HD-DVD, and Blu-Ray. With your vote, I'll bring truth, justice, and corrections to the IMDb and see that every new contributor receives proper training.
With YOUR vote, I can make a difference in the movie community!
Free popcorn for everyone!  | | | | -- Enry |
|
| Registered: August 22, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,807 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting m.cellophane: Quote:
Could we get some direction on when a post warrants negative feedback from the perspective of Invelos administrators? Is it only for violation of the forum rules or can it also include posts viewed by the voter as unhelpful, rude, attacking, insulting, etc? None of these are explicitly prohibited by the forum rules unless they rise to the level of "repeated harassment of another member."
Well, if "repeated harassment of another member" is a "bannable" offense, I suppose that "harassment of another member" is a behavior that should warrant negative feedback. | | | | -- Enry |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 2,692 |
| | Posted: | | | | one idea for an enhancement which could be added is that you are required to add a reason when you give negative feedback (similar to when you vote against a profile) | | | | Paul |
|
| Registered: March 10, 2007 | | Posts: 4,282 |
| | Posted: | | | | Added a new FAQ entry under the Website category, with more information on the reputation system and the proper use of feedback. | | | | Invelos Software, Inc. Representative | | | | Last edited: by Ken Cole |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 17,804 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting pauls42: Quote:
one idea for an enhancement which could be added is that you are required to add a reason when you give negative feedback (similar to when you vote against a profile) IMHO you a already required to add a reason for negative feedback. In the My Profiler section/Reputation you can read above: "..In addition to monitoring the forums, administrators will monitor rating submissions. Negative ratings wihout cause will be removed and may result in submitter rating reduction and/or rating permission removal." I would interpret this general for all kind of feedbacks?! | | | | Thorsten | | | | Last edited: by kahless |
|
| Registered: March 10, 2007 | | Posts: 4,282 |
| | Posted: | | | | Congratulations to Kathy who has become the first to earn a reputation star! | | | | Invelos Software, Inc. Representative | | | | Last edited: by Ken Cole |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,804 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Ken Cole: Quote:
Congratulations to Kathy who has become the first to earn a reputation star! Well deserved! Congrats!!  | | | | Thorsten |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,310 |
| | Posted: | | | | Congrats Kathy | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,804 |
| | Posted: | | | | Hallo Ken, will the bad indicators be visible to the public as well? IMHO this rating system could initiate a kind of competition in the community?!  | | | | Thorsten | | | | Last edited: by kahless |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 3,321 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Ken Cole: Quote:
Congratulations to Kathy who has become the first to earn a reputation star! I'm not the least bit surprised that she's first. And it's very well deserved. She's not just been nice since it's now required, she's always been nice.  | | | Get the CSVExport and Database Query plug-ins here.
Create fake parent profiles to organize your collection. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 462 |
| | Posted: | | | | Kathy's always been the cream of the crop as far as that goes, definitely. A real asset to the community. | | | "I am Andrew Ryan and I am here to ask you a question:
Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his own brow?
No, says the man in Washington. It belongs to the poor.
No, says the man in the Vatican. It belongs to God.
No, says the man in Moscow. It belongs to everyone.
I rejected those answers. Instead, I chose something
different. I chose the impossible. I chose…
Rapture." |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,480 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Ken Cole: Quote:
Added a new FAQ entry under the Website category, with more information on the reputation system and the proper use of feedback. Thank you. Quoting Ken Cole: Quote:
Congratulations to Kathy who has become the first to earn a reputation star! Not surprising. Way to go, Kathy! | | | ...James
"People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess." ~ Dexter Morgan |
|
| Registered: May 29, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,475 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Ken Cole: Quote:
Congratulations to Kathy who has become the first to earn a reputation star! Oh my...thank you everyone! I do hope that I earned positive reputation star and not <gasp> the other.  |
|